Page 39 - IJPS-10-3

International Journal of
Population Studies Prenatal care in Santa Catarina, Brazil

Anversa et al. (level 4); PR (95% CI) Model4 Model 3 Model 2 0.82 (0.26; 2.58) 0.77 (0.27; 2.20) 0.63 (0.35; 1.13) 1.08 (0.77; 1.52) 1.14 (0.84; 1.56) 1.16 (0.86; 1.45) 1.56 (0.98; 2.50) 1.64 (1.08; 2.50) 1.06 (0.82; 1.57)

Modified APNCU index; PR (95% CI) Model 4 Model 3 Model 2 0.78 (0.58; 1.06) 0.72 (0.54; 0.95) 0.85 (0.65; 1.09) 1.07 (0.91; 1.24) 1.04 (0.90; 1.21) 1.00 (0.88; 1.13) 0.77 (0.53; 1.13) 0.81 (0.56; 1.17) 0.84 (0.64; 1.11) Notes: *Minimum wage: BRL 1,212.00. **Referral to high-risk prenatal care (HPRN). Adjusted for age, education, and referral to high-risk PN by a Poisson regression model with robust variance. Model 2=all sociodemographic variables (

Kessner index modified by Takeda; PR (95% CI) Model 4 Model 3 Model 2 0.78 (0.60; 1.02) 0.77 (0.60; 0.98) 0.88 (0.70; 1.12) 1.08 (0.94; 1.24) 1.07 (0.95; 1.21) 1.92 (0.91; 1.15) 0.86 (0.64; 1.15) 0.90 (0.69; 1.18) 0.88 (0.69; 1.12) Abbreviations: CI: Confidence interval; PR: Prevalence ratio; APNCU: Adequacy of prenatal care utilization.

Table A1. (Continued) Factors Smoking during pregnancy Yes No Alcohol use before pregnancy Yes No Alcohol use during pregnancy Yes No pregnancy. Model 4=all variables shown in the table.

Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024) 33 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.1422