Page 136 - IJPS-10-4
P. 136

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                 Household on teens’ COVID-19 prevention




            Table 2. Percentage distribution of COVID‑19 behavioral   Table 2. (Continued)
            changes among adolescents and young adults aged 15 – 24
            by background/household characteristics in South Africa  Background     Behavioral changes (n=5581)
                                                               characteristics    Low    Medium   High  p‑value
            Background           Behavioral changes (n=5581)                      n (%)   n (%)   n (%)
            characteristics    Low    Medium   High  p‑value
                               n (%)   n (%)   n (%)            Family          89 (39.4)  124 (54.9)  13 (5.7)
                                                                No income       57 (45.9)  62 (50.0)  5 (4.0)
            Gender                                  0.004*
                                                                Pension         64 (48.1)  68 (51.1)  1 (0.7)
             Male            878 (40.8)  1,282 (55.9) 70 (3.3)
                                                               Household members                       0.35 ns
             Female          1,259 (36.7) 2,030 (59.2) 142 4.1)  who received grants
            Ethnicity                               0.09        None            1,419 (37.9) 1,168 (58.0) 150 (4.0)
             African/Black   1,845 (38.2) 2,810 (58.1) 179 (3.7)  1             479 (38.4)  719 (57.7)  48 (3.8)
             Colored         179 (38.7)  271 (58.3)  13 (2.8)   2+              239 (39.9)  345 (57.7)  14 (2.3)
             Asian/Indian    16 (36.4)  25 (56.8)  3 (6.8)     Notes: **p<0.01; *p<0.05; ns: Non-significant.
             White           97 (40.4)  126 (52.5)  17 (7.0)   Abbreviation: ABET: Adult basic education and training.
            Province of residence                   0.05*
                                                                  Our study revealed that adolescents who reported
             Western Cape    154 (37.5)  242 (58.9)  15 (3.6)  to have come from households with no access to water
             Eastern Cape    211 (38.6)  318 (58.2  17 (3.1)   and electricity had a low behavioral change during the
             Northern Cape   120 (35.9)  207 (61.9)  7 (2.1)   COVID-19 period compared to those who had access to
             Free State      99 (29.5)  221 (65.9)  15 (4.5)   water and electricity (41.2% vs. 37.3%; p < 0.04). Household
             KwaZulu-Natal   652 (39.8)  918 (56.0)  68 (4.2)  income and size were found to be associated with the
             North West      114 (34.3)  201 (60.5)  17 (5.1)  chances of adopting new behaviors during the COVID-
             Gauteng         326 (38.2)  490 (57.4)  37 (4.3)  19 period, and only households that received grants were
                                                               found not to be associated with adopting new measures of
             Mpumalanga      213 (39.9)  302 (56.5)  19 (3.6)  behaviors throughout the COVID-19 outbreak.
             Limpopo         248 41.5)  333 (55.7)  17 (2.8)
            Education level                         0.001**    3.4. COVID-19 preventive measures among
             National certificate  19 (35.8)  31 (58.5)  3 (5.7)  adolescents and young adults aged 15 – 24
             Senior certificate  825 (33.5)  1,521 (61.8) 116 (3.0)  by background/household characteristics in
                                                               South Africa
             Below senior    1,190 (43.1) 1,603 (55.6) 88 (3.0)
             certificate                                       Table 3 presents the percentage distribution of adolescents
             ABET            6 (31.6)  13 (68.4)  0 (0.0)      who adopted some level of preventive measures  during
             No schooling    97 (59.4)  64 (38.5)  5 (3.0)     COVID-19 in South Africa. Bivariate analysis revealed
            Household access to                     0.9 ns     that some individual and household characteristics were
                                                               associated with adolescent preventive measures adopted
            electricity
             Yes             2,031 (38.3) 3,065 (57.8) 202 (3.8)  during the COVID-19 period (p < 0.01) in South Africa.
                                                               From the three categories of preventive measures created
             No              106 (37.5)  167 (59.0)  10 (3.5)  for this study, 45% of adolescents, both male and female,
            Household access to water               0.004*     adopted one to three preventive measures, while <5% of
             Yes             1,531 (37.3) 2,407 (58.6) 171 (4.2)  adolescents reported adopting more than four preventive
             No              606 (41.2)  825 (56.0)  41 (2.8)  measures during the pandemic. The findings also reveal a
            Household size                          0.08       relationship between ethnicity and province of residence
             1 – 4           980 (37.0)  1,564 (59.0) 104 (3.9)  during the COVID-19 period. Adolescents from the Free
                                                               State and Gauteng provinces adopted the highest number
             5 – 6           748 (40.4)  1,027 (55.5) 75 (4.0)  of preventive measures, with 9.2% and 6.2%, respectively.
             7+              409 (37.8)  641 (59.2)  33 (3.0)
                                                                  Among the household-level factors, the study revealed
            Household income                        0.001**    that adolescents with no access to water had a higher chance
             Employment      840 (33.9)  1,521 (61.5) 113 (4.6)  of adopting one to three preventive measures compared to
             Business        112 (33.8)  201 (60.7)  18 (5.4)  those who had access to water (52.2% vs. 47.9%; p < 0.001).
             Government grants  973 (42.5)  1,255 (54.8) 62 (2.7)  Access to electricity and household size were found not
                                                    (Cont’d...)

            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       130                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.2751
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141