Page 122 - IJPS-11-1
P. 122

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                          Developing individual active aging measurement tool



            meet the exigent criteria of active aging were included,   Availability of data
            taking into account the various dimensions, abilities, and
            activities present in their lives. It provides some progress   The data used in this work are available from the
                                                               corresponding author on reasonable request.
            toward a  broader  version of  active  aging.  Moreover, this
            tool is aimed at an individual level and could contribute to   References
            meeting the need to provide empirical evidence regarding
            the effectiveness of intervention programs (Bowling &   Avramov, D., & Maskova, M. (2003). Active aging in Europe-
                                                                  volume 1. Population Studies, 41(41):1-152.
            Iliffe, 2006). In doing so, the recommendations about
            incorporating the heterogeneity of older people as a   Bélanger, E., Ahmed, T., Filiatrault, J., Yu, H.T., & Zunzunegui, M.V.
            continuum are incorporated (Fernández-Ballesteros, 2009).   (2017). An empirical comparison of different models of
            Its importance is reflected in the manifest concern about the   active aging in Canada: The international mobility in aging
                                                                  study. The Gerontologist, 57(2):197-205.
            transformation of this paradigm into an excessively idealized
            one, which may result in a negative impact on older people’s      https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv126
            well-being by presenting an extremely positive image   Bellón, J.A., Delgado, S.A., Luna, J.D., & Lardelli, P. (1996a).
            of  active  aging  and  neglecting  the  reality  faced  by  older   Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de apoyo social
            adults (Hasmanová, 2011; Holstein & Minkler, 2007). The   funcional Duke-UNC-11. [Validity and reliability of the
            results obtained support the hypothesis of including two   Duke-UNC-11 questionnaire of functional social support].
            big types of variables as components of active aging: Those   Atención Primaria, 18(4):153-163, 158-163.
            referring to global health and those alluding to different   Bellón, J.A., Delgado, S.A., Luna, J.D., & Lardelli, P. (1996b).
            ways of participation. All these variables are proposed   Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de función familiar
            from a multidimensional perspective by matching different   Apgar-familiar. [Validity  and  reliability of  the  Apgar-
            spheres of people’s lives. Thus, the triangle created by the   familial family function questionnaire]. Atención Primaria,
            three approximations found in the literature (political,   18(6):289-295.
            scientific, and social) is reconciled in a certain manner.  Berg, A.I. (2008). Life Satisfaction in Late Life: Markers and
                                                                  Predictors of Level and Change Among 80+ Year Olds. [PhD
            Acknowledgments                                       Thesis]. Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
            None.                                              Biggs, S. (2001). Toward critical narrativity: Stories of aging
                                                                  in contemporary social policy.  Journal of Aging Studies,
            Funding                                               15(4):303-316.

            The data collection and research were conducted with      https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065(01)00025-1
            financial support from Consellería de Traballo e Benestar   Boudiny,  K.  (2013).  “Active  aging”:  From  empty  rhetoric  to
            (Xunta de Galicia) and Valedor do Pobo de Galicia.    effective policy tool. Aging and Society, 33(6):1077-1098.
            Conflict of interest                                  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1200030X
                                                               Boudiny, K., & Mortelmans, D. (2011). A  critical perspective:
            The authors declare that they have no competing interests.  Towards a broader understanding of “active aging”. Electronic
                                                                  Journal of Applied Psychology, 7(1):8-14.
            Author contributions
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.7790/ejap.v7i1.232
            Conceptualization: Sara Marsillas, Jesús Varela    Bowling, A. (2008). Enhancing later life: How older people
            Formal analysis: Sara Marsillas, Antonio Rial         perceive  active  ageing?  Aging and Mental Health,
            Investigation: Sara Marsillas, Antonio Rial           12(3):293-301.
            Methodology: All authors
            Writing – original draft: Sara Marsillas              https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802120979
            Writing – review & editing: All authors            Bowling, A. (2009). Perceptions of active ageing in Britain:
                                                                  Divergences between minority ethnic and whole population
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            samples. Age and Aging, 38(6):703-710.

            The acquisition of ethical approval is not necessary, as      https://doi.org/10.1093/aging/afp175
            participants have given their verbal consent.      Bowling, A., & Iliffe, S. (2006). Which model of successful ageing
                                                                  should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal
            Consent for publication                               survey of ageing. Age and Aging, 35(6):607-614.
            Informed consent was provided verbally.               https://doi.org/10.1093/aging/afl100


            Volume 11 Issue 1 (2025)                       116                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.428
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127