Page 103 - IJPS-11-2
P. 103

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                         Do female-headed households have poorer finances?



            1.1. Financial health and research questions       household financial management. The study compares the

            The concept of financial health was first introduced by the   financial health status of female-headed and male-headed
            Center for Financial Services Innovation (CFSI) in 2015.   households utilizing four  variables: income-expenditure
            However, there is still no consensus among researchers and   balance, possession of commercial insurance, regular
            organizations on its precise definition and measurement.   savings accounts, and financial investment products.
            Terms such as “financial health,” “financial well-being,”   Therefore, based on the question of whether female-
            “financial wellness,” and “financial fitness” are often used   headed households have poorer financial health than
            interchangeably.                                   male-headed households, the study proposes the following
              The measurement of financial health varies significantly,   four hypotheses:
            often focusing on specific aspects of a household’s financial   H1: Female-headed households have a statistically different
            situation. CFSI developed a framework that includes four   balance of income and expenditure compared to male-
            main components: spending, saving, borrowing, and     headed households.
            planning. This framework delineates eight indicators to   H2: Female-headed households have a statistically different
            evaluate these components: spending less  than income,   likelihood of having commercial insurance compared
            paying  bills on time and in full, having sufficient  living   to male-headed households.
            expenses in liquid savings, having sufficient long-term   H3: Female-headed households have  a statistically
            savings or assets, having a sustainable debt load, having   different likelihood to save compared to male-headed
            a prime credit score, having appropriate insurance, and   households.
            planning ahead for expense (Parker et al., 2016).  H4: Female-headed households have  a statistically
                                                                  different probability of owning investment products
              Furthermore, the Consumer Financial Protection      compared to male-headed households.
            Bureau  (CFPB)  offers  a consumer-driven  definition  of
            financial health (or financial well-being), portraying it as   2. Data and methods
            a state of being wherein a person can fully meet current   2.1. Data and sample
            and ongoing financial obligations, can feel secure in their
            financial future, and is able to make choices that allow them   The  research employs cross-sectional  data  from  the
            to enjoy life (CFPB, 2017). CFPB proposed four elements   China Household Finance Survey Project (CHFS2019),
            of financial health: having control over day-to-day and   a comprehensive national survey carried out in 2017
            month-to-month finances; having the capacity to absorb a   by the China Household Finance  Survey and Research
            financial shock; being on track to meet your financial goals;   Center at Southwest University of Finance and
            and having the financial freedom to make the choices that   Economics. This survey covers 29 provinces (regions),
            allow you to enjoy life (CFPB, 2017). In 2020, Innovations   343 counties, and 1360 village (residential) committees
            for  Poverty  Action  (IPA)  described  financial  health  in   across China, providing detailed micro-level information
            terms of the ability to access funds quickly and affordably,   on demographic characteristics, household assets
            which we refer to as Access-to-Funds. They proposed three   and liabilities, insurance coverage, as well as income
            primary concepts that encompass financial health: Access-  and expenditure status. The dataset includes 34,643
            to-Funds, which is a final outcome construct, and Access-  participants from 34,643 households, representing a total
            to-Finance and Financial Behavior, which are intermediate   of 107,001 residents. The CHFS baseline survey, known
            constructs that each incorporates several components   for its face-to-face household interviews, ensures both
            (Brune et al., 2020).                              national and provincial representativeness.
              Given the variety of indicators proposed by different   For this study, the household and individual datasets
            researchers and institutions, this study developed four   were merged using the household and member IDs.
            specific indicators to assess financial health. These   Subsequently, a  sample  of  respondents  who  were
            indicators were chosen based on the previously discussed   household heads aged between 16 and 80 at the time of
            indicators and the variables available in the data used for   the interview was selected. This age range was chosen
            this study. These indicators include (i) income-expenditure   because individuals aged 16 and above, whose primary
            balance, (ii) the ability to control debt and risk, such as   livelihood source is their labor income, are considered
            having emergency insurance in case of sudden loss of   to have full civil capacity, whereas individuals over 80
            income, (iii) wealth planning and managing future financial   are considered to have limited civil capacity. The final
            income and expenses, such as having a regular savings   sample size of household heads within this age range is
            account, and (iv) the ability to invest in the future, such as   33,463.


            Volume 11 Issue 2 (2025)                        97                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.4403
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108