Page 120 - IJPS-11-2
P. 120

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                Gendered division of household labor in Iran




            Table 3. Predictors of greater share of women in domestic labor division, child care, and family decision‑making (beta from
            multivariate regression models)
            Predictors                                         Domestic labor   Childcare scale  Family decision‑making
                                                               division scale                   power scale
            Man’s education                                    −0.080*        −0.054*           −0.017
            Woman’s education                                  −0.076*        −0.004            0.083**
            Man’s income                                       0.096*         0.101*            0.001
            Woman’s income                                     −0.110*        −0.054*           0.016
            Income earner status (dual earner)                 −0.235***      −0.150***         0.065*
            Couple’s relative level of education (Women’s equal or higher education)  0.063  0.105*  0.019
            Couple’s relative level of income (Women’s equal or higher income)  0.002  0.046    0.041
            Parent’s SES                                       −0.038         0.003             −0.032
            Length of marriage                                 0.031          −0.005            0.101**
            Having children                                    0.110**        -                 0.015
            F (sig.)                                           34.82 (0.001)  6.23 (0.001)      2.85 (0.001)
            Adjusted R-square (%)                              43.1           20.8              14.8
            Breusch–Pagan test                                 Insignificant  Insignificant     Insignificant
            Skewness (kurtosis) tests                          −1.298 (1.857)  −0.901 (1.298)   0.453 (1.650)
            Durbin–Watson statistic                            1.87           1.76              1.74
            Notes: A higher score indicates a larger share of women in domestic labor division, child care, and family decision-making. The values of VIF of all
            variables in the table are under 5. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
            associated with a decrease in women’s engagement in   education can explain the gender differentials in power
            domestic chores. Higher education can result in higher   and decision-making in the family and division of labor
            income, allowing individuals to outsource or delegate   household chores (An, 2008; Shu et al., 2012). Therefore,
            household chores (Gupta, 2007). Education also enhances   according to the relative resource bargaining perspective,
            negotiation and bargaining skills, as well as promotes   the partner with more economic resources and power
            gender egalitarianism (Román, 2021; Magda et al., 2024).   (usually determined by income and educational level) has
            However, our findings align with previous research (e.g.,   the ability to dictate their role within the household, while
            Sayer et al., 2004) showing that the relationship between   the partner with fewer economic resources takes a larger
            education and housework is not consistent for childcare,   share of unpaid domestic work (Garcia & Tomlinson, 2021).
            which is often viewed as a more fulfilling activity.   In addition, our findings  indicate that despite  the
            Women’s income was found to be inversely associated   increase in women’s involvement in household decision-
            with housework and childcare, while men’s income tended   making and having access to bargaining power, they are still
            to have a positive association with these responsibilities.   primarily responsible for household and childcare duties.
            Magda et al. (2024) also noted that women’s participation
            in housework decreases as their share of total household   Housework and childcare remain largely perceived as
            income increases. However, women do not significantly   femininity (Sekeráková Búriková, 2023), a pattern observed
            benefit from their male partners’ income in terms of   in  various  regions  including  Asia  and  Southern  Europe
            housework (Gupta, 2006). In addition, shifting from a   (Fisher & Robinson, 2011; Kim, 2018). Studies consistently
            single-earner to a dual-earner family status was associated   found that women perform a disproportionately high share
            with a decrease in women’s involvement in household tasks   of household tasks, even in the most egalitarian contexts
            and childcare. Winkler and Ireland (2009) observed that   (Moreno-Colom, 2017). Gender disparities in household
            dual-earner wives typically spend less time on household   labor persist, even when accounting for resource-based
            management  compared  to  single-earner  wives.  Overall,   factors, largely due to the “stickiness” of gender role
            women’s access to financial resources appears to empower   expectations (Altman & Humberd, 2023). From a gender-
            them, leading to a reduction in their domestic labor and an   centered approach, cultural norms and social expectations
            increase in their participation in family decision-making.   often dictate that wives are tasked with cooking and caring
            In this regard, the relative resources perspective suggests   for children, while husbands are expected to work outside
            that differences in individual resources such as income and   the home to support the family (Alem et al., 2023). Thus,


            Volume 11 Issue 2 (2025)                       114                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.3212
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125