Page 117 - IJPS-11-2
P. 117

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                Gendered division of household labor in Iran



            gender disparities in domestic labor and family decision-  child, income earner status, parent’s socioeconomic status,
            making  are  strongly  influenced  by  gender  roles  (Chung   and the couple’s relative income and education levels.
            and Lee, 2017; Campaña et al., 2023). Social norms and   The respondents’ education levels were classified as
            values determine which tasks should and should not be   below a diploma, a diploma, or tertiary education. The
            carried out by women and men (Campaña et al., 2018).   family income was categorized as <600 USD, 600 – 1000
            The theoretical framework in this study is grounded in   USD, or more than 1000 USD per month. The length of
            the resource-based approach. Therefore, we expect that an   marriage was divided into either <5 years, 5 – 10 years, 10
            individual’s division of domestic work is determined by   – 19 years, or 20 years and above. Having a child was also
            their socioeconomic status in relation to their partners.
                                                               considered as an independent variable.
            2. Data and methods                                  Income earner status refers to the position of income
            2.1. Data source and sampling                      earners within a family, either as a single earner or as a
                                                               dual earner.  Parents’ socioeconomic status was defined
            The research used data from the 2015 Survey of Married   as their perceived social and economic standing of
            Lifestyle in Tehran City, conducted by the first author. With   parents, classified as low, medium, or high. The couple’s
            a  95%  confidence  level,  a  sampling  error  of  0.05,  and  a   relative education  level  was calculated by comparing the
            design effect of 2, the sample size was determined to be   educational levels of the man and woman, which can be
            around 1730. The study targeted married individuals, with   categorized as  men’s higher education, equal  education,
            one spouse chosen randomly for inclusion. Sampling was   or women’s higher education. The couple’s relative income
            done using the probability proportional to size method,   level was determined by the difference between the man’s
            with samples collected from 50 districts in Tehran.  and woman’s income, classified as either men’s higher

            2.2. Measures                                      income, equal income, or women’s higher income.
            The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were   2.3. Statistical analysis
            evaluated using expert qualifications, face and construct   Data analysis was carried out using descriptive
            validity, and Cronbach’s alpha. Our analysis focused   statistical analysis methods and regression in Statistical
            on three dependent variables: division of domestic   Package for the Social Sciences software v26. Different
            labor, childcare responsibilities, and family decision-  specification and diagnostic tests were performed to
            making power.                                      assess ordinary least square assumptions, as well as the

              The division of domestic labor  was  assessed based  on   accuracy and validity of statistical analyses. Multivariate
            tasks such as cooking, dishwashing, and house cleaning.   linear regression models were used to investigate the
            The  Cronbach’s alpha  coefficient of  internal consistency   impact of socioeconomic factors on family decision-
            was 0.75, which indicates acceptable reliability. A higher   making power, division of domestic labor, and childcare
            score on this scale indicates a greater burden of household   responsibilities.
            duties on women.
              Childcare responsibilities  were  measured  by tasks   3. Results
            such as overseeing children’s homework, helping with   3.1. Descriptive analyses
            dressing, managing sleep routines, caring for sick children,   The socioeconomic variables are described in Table 1. The
            and engaging in play or conversation with children.   average age of the respondents was 44.1 years (Standard
            The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.82, which indicates strong   deviation = 12.7). Around a third of the respondents had
            reliability. A  higher score on this scale signifies a large   tertiary education, 82% had children, and 45% had been
            share of childcare duties being carried out by women.  married for  over  20  years.  Women  were  the  financial
              Family decision-making power  was  assessed in areas   contributors in 21% of households. There was a significant
            such as family affairs, leisure activities, major purchases,   income  gap  between  men  and  women.  Around  54% of
            parenting styles, visits to relatives and friends, and   couples had equal levels of education, while 10% had equal
            identifying the primary decision-maker in the family.   income levels.
            The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.84, which indicates strong   Table 2 displays how domestic labor division, childcare
            reliability. A higher score on this scale suggests that women   responsibilities, and decision-making are distributed
            play a more significant role in family decision-making.  within households.  According to the findings,  there is
              The  study  considered  various  independent  variables,   significant gender inequality, with approximately 90% of
            including education, income, length of marriage, having a   women handling household tasks and 71% taking care of


            Volume 11 Issue 2 (2025)                       111                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.3212
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122