Page 10 - IJPS-11-6
P. 10

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                   Education of Rohingya disabled children



            opportunities, specialized educational materials, and   (1981) describes community development theory
            skilled personnel – are necessary to meet their needs.   as  participative, distributive,  and focused  on  human
            Yates et al. (2019) further highlight that foreign aid and   development. Lane (1995) further emphasizes the pivotal
            local ownership are equally important in advancing the   role of participation in development theory, whereas Hall
            education of children with disabilities.           & Midgley (1986) highlight that community participation

              This study adopts three theoretical lenses – social systems   is informed by social work, development theory, radical
            theory, foreign aid theory, and community development   community action, and Western ideologies. The decision
            theory – to construct its conceptual foundation and develop   to employ social systems theory, foreign aid theory, and
            an operational framework for examining facilitators and   community development theory was driven by their
            barriers to education for children with disabilities in the   relevance in explaining and linking the structural, financial,
            Rohingya camps. Rapp and Corral-Granados (2024)    and participatory factors influencing the education of
            noted that education for children with disabilities is often   children with disabilities in Rohingya camps.
            framed through normative concepts such as “justice” and   Figures 3 and 4 present the theoretical and operational
            “democracy.” However, operationalizing these ideals in   frameworks of this study.
            real-world contexts is challenging due to the subjective
            interpretations  that  vary  across  time  and  place.  For   1.3. Research questions
            instance, educational systems often apply context-specific
            inclusion and exclusion criteria. Nevertheless, the current   This paper aims to examine the major facilitators and
            study seeks to move beyond these contextual limitations   barriers to education for children with disabilities
            and examine the education of children with disabilities   living in Rohingya camps and to provide actionable
            through a normative, rights-based lens.            recommendations. We address two key research questions:
                                                               (i)  What  are  the  major  facilitators  and  barriers  to
              Social systems theory, developed by Luhmann in 1995,   education for children with disabilities?
            views society as a network of interactions among various   (ii)  What are the key areas of intervention for relevant
            actors and institutions, structured through shared cultural   stakeholders to enhance educational opportunities for
            norms. It explains the relational dynamics between    children with disabilities?
            individuals, groups, sub-groups, and institutions. In this
            context, the Rohingya are victims of targeted violence   2. Data and method
            and  live as  stateless  refugees,  forming a  unique  societal
            subsystem within refugee camps.                    The study design serves as a comprehensive framework or
                                                               step-by-step process for achieving the research objectives.
              In terms of foreign aid, Wamboye et al. (2013) found that   It outlines the study instruments, sample population,
            it promotes a safer environment for refugees, supporting   sampling  procedures,  data  collection  methods,  analysis
            essential areas such as nutrition, health, and education.   techniques, and the ethical considerations addressed. This
            Similarly, Burde  et al. (2017) emphasize the value of   study employs both qualitative and quantitative descriptive
            foreign assistance in education during emergencies and   approaches.
            post-emergency recovery, helping to safeguard children’s
            emotional and behavioral well-being. Pankaj (2005)   Table 1. Focus group discussion participants: Parents of
            outlines two competing perspectives in foreign aid theory:   children with disabilities
            (i) pro-aid, which views aid as a catalyst for peace and
            prosperity between developed and developing nations,   Participant Sex  Age Education Relationship Living place
            and (ii) anti-aid, which critiques aid as a form of neo-  1  Female  27  Illiterate  Mother  Camp 7
            imperialism that perpetuates inequality. In the context of   2  Female  36  Grade 5  Mother  Camp 7
            the Rohingya crisis, foreign aid has played a crucial role   3  Female  30  Illiterate  Mother  Camp 7
            in meeting basic needs such as food and shelter. However,   4  Female  38  Illiterate  Mother  Camp 7
            as the Rohingya population has remained in camps since
            2017, there is now an urgent need for foreign agencies   5  Female  32  Grade 3  Mother  Camp 7
            to prioritize strategies for their safe and sustainable   6  Male  30  Grade 4  Father  Camp 12
            repatriation to Myanmar.                           7        Male   36  Illiterate  Father  Camp 12

              Community development is a process of socioeconomic   8   Male   35  Illiterate  Father  Camp 12
            improvement that empowers individuals and groups   9        Male   52  Grade 4  Father  Camp 12
            to collaborate in enhancing their living standards and   10  Male  31  Grade 8  Father  Camp 12
            expanding their opportunities (Weil et al., 2005). Pandey   Source: Fieldwork, April – May 2023.


            Volume 11 Issue 6 (2025)                        4                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.8097
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15