Page 57 - IJPS-7-2
P. 57

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                    Child mortality by residence in Ethiopia



            2.3. Statistical methods                           is based on multiplying regression coefficients using

            We used STATA version 15.1 for statistical data processing   regressors. And hence, to explain the urban-rural, intra-
            and analysis. We checked missing values, and there were   urban, and intra-rural inequalities in child mortality, we
            no missing values for the outcome variable, but children   used the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique for a
            with unknown birth places and children from not de jure   non-linear variable. This technique allows for quantifying
                                                               the gap between the advantaged and the disadvantaged
            residents were excluded from the analysis, which accounted   groups (Ameyaw et al., 2021; Bazen et al., 2016; Fairlie,
            for 3.2% of the cases. In this study, de jure residents refer to   2005; Jann, 2008; Bado & Appunni, 2015; Sinning et al.,
            those residents who are usually living in a given area and   2008; Yaya et al., 2019).
            who were counted as the resident of that area. We used
            a correlation matrix to test multicollinearity effect of the   3. Results
            explanatory variables using a cutoff of 0.6 known to cause
            concern in multicollinearity (Senaviratna & Cooray, 2019).   3.1. Background characteristics of the study
            Due to high and strong collinearity with a place of residence   participants
            (r = 0.8077) and sex of household head (r = 0.6236), the total   Table 1 shows the background characteristics of the study
            children ever born variable was removed from the model.   population.  Table 1 shows that 45.47% of children were
            Place of residence cannot be removed since it is the key   born to mothers residing in emerging regions and almost
            identifier in investigating residential inequality in child   the same proportion was born to mothers in developed
            mortality. After removal of the total number of children ever   regions, and 81.8% of children were born in rural areas.
            born, an absolute correlation coefficient of <0.6 was observed   The majority (78.56%) of respondent women were from
            among predictors indicating the absence of multicollinearity.   male-headed households; 83.09% of children were born
            Although the variable ‘total children ever born’ was removed   to households that had unimproved sanitation facilities;
            from the model, the birth order was included in the model to   only 5.28% of children were born to households that had
            explore the relative effects of fertility on child mortality.  clean cooking fuel; and 55.49% of households had six or

              Considering the hierarchical nature of the 2016 EDHS   more members. Table 1 also depicts that more than half
            dataset into account, we used multilevel (i.e., three level:   (54.8%) of children were born to households grouped
            Community, household, and individual level) analysis   with poor wealth status; 45.5% of children were born to
            technique to get unbiased estimates of standard errors   households that had improved sources of drinking water.
                                                               Most (70.7%) children were born at home; a slightly higher
            and enable the modeling of between-level interactions by   proportion (52.1%) of children were female. Table 1 also
            treating every effect at the appropriate level. A multilevel   illustrates that 19.7%, 43.9%, and 36.4% of children were
            modeling explicitly accounts for the clustering of the units   born in the 1 , the 2  – 4  birth order, and 5  and above
                                                                                                    th
                                                                                    th
                                                                               nd
                                                                          st
            of analysis. Besides,  the multilevel modeling provides a   birth order, respectively. More than 80% of mothers had
            unified treatment for effects at individual, household, and   initiated breastfeeding with their kids immediately after
            community levels. Since the outcome variable is binary,   birth. About 6% of mothers had given birth before entering
            a multilevel logistic regression (Balluerka  et  al., 2010;   the age of 18 years. More than 66% of children were born
            Gelman & Hill, 2010) was used as a standard model for   to uneducated mothers. Nearly 29% of children were born
            assessing the effect of socioeconomic and contextual   to mothers of Orthodox religion and 51.2% were born to
            factors on child mortality in this study. Accordingly, four   mothers of Muslim religion followers (Table 1).
            models were fitted, including null model. The null model
            was  fitted  to determine  whether  the  use  of  multilevel   3.2. Results from multilevel analyses
            modeling  was  appropriate  in  the  analysis.  Further,  all
            models  were  checked  through  interclass  correlation   Table 2 presents results from the multilevel regression
            (ICC) and criteria information tests (AIC and BIC) and   analysis. Here, it is crucial to understand that all individual
                                                               and household level factors are nested within the
            their values were used to select the best model fitted for   community (place of residence), hence, it needs to explain
            multilevel analysis. We used likelihood ratio (LR) test to   the residential inequalities using multilevel analysis. With
            test statistically significant difference between two models   this understanding, four multilevel models were fitted
            based on the ratio of their likelihoods.
                                                               using only variables with P < 0.2 (Heinze & Dunkler, 2017)
              We also used decomposition analysis to quantify the   from the bivariate analysis (not presented in this paper).
            contribution  of  observed  and  unobserved  heterogeneity   The overall multilevel analysis was conducted with random
            at the individual, household, and community levels.   intercept (only) model for both community and household
            The  decomposition  analysis  helps  understand  variance   levels. First, the null model (Model 0, i.e., a model without
            estimates whether regressors are random or fixed, which   explanatory variables) was fitted and showed statistically


            Volume 7 Issue 2 (2021)                         51                     https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v7i2.392
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62