Page 65 - IJPS-8-2
P. 65

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                    Projecting sex ratio at birth in Pakistan






























            Figure 5. SRB estimates in Balochistan, 1980 – 2020
            Note: Red line and shaded areas are the medians and 95% credible intervals of the province-specific SRB, respectively. The green horizontal line is the SRB
            baseline for the whole of Pakistan at 1.056 (Chao et al., 2019a). The SRB observations (dots) from the same source are connected with line segments of the
            same color. Shaded areas around the observation series represent the sampling errors in the series (quantified by twice the sampling standard errors). Blue
            vertical lines denote the start and end years of the sex ratio transition.

            Table 3. Missing female births model results in Balochistan

             Values are in thousands                                Time period
                                    1980 – 1990     1991 – 2000     2001 – 2010      2011 – 2020     1980 – 2020
            Estimated female births    124.2           124.2           153.2           174.9           143.6
                                    [122.3; 125.8]  [123.3; 125.5]  [151.5; 155.1]  [173.1; 176.2]  [142.9; 144.4]
            Expected female births     127.8           131.7           159.2           176.4           148.3
                                    [126.3; 129.6]  [130.5; 132.7]  [157.4; 160.9]  [175.2; 178.2]  [147.6; 149.0]
            AMFB                       3.7             7.6             6.0              1.8             4.7
                                      [0.7; 7.4]      [5.0; 9.4]      [2.3; 9.4]      [0.1; 5.1]      [3.4; 6.1]
            CMFB                       40.2            76.1            60.1            18.2            194.6
                                     [7.4; 81.2]     [50.0; 93.9]    [23.5; 94.1]    [0.5; 51.0]    [140.0; 248.9]
            Note: All values are in thousands. Numbers in front of the brackets are the posterior medians, and those inside brackets are the 95% credible intervals.
            The estimated female births, expected female births, and AMFBs are averaged over each period. The CMFBs are the cumulative values over each period.
            AMFB: Annual number of missing female births. CMFB: Cumulative number of missing female births.

            period, the lower bound of the 95% credible intervals of   of the AMFB, the CMFB between 1980 and 2020 is estimated
            SRB exceeded the national baseline.                at 194.6 [140.0; 248.9] in Balochistan province. Our results are
                                                               consistent with previous results (Qayyum & Rehan, 2017) of
            3.3. Missing female births before 2020 in Balochistan  sex-selective abortion in Balochistan. Although the data of that
            Table 3 lists the missing female births in Balochistan over   study were collected only from the rural areas (and hence may
            different time periods. From the estimated and expected female   not be provincially representative), Balochistan had the highest
            births, we demonstrate the baseline magnitude of female births   rate of sex-selective abortion during the 2011 – 2014 period.
            in Balochistan. The estimated average AMFB over the four
            decades from 1980 to 2020 is 4.7 [3.4; 6.1] thousand. On a   3.4. Scenario-based missing female births
            decade-by-decade basis, the average AMFB increased from   simulation after 2020
            3.7 [0.7; 7.4] in 1980 – 1990 to 7.6 [5.0; 9.4] in 1991 – 2000,   Although we identify Balochistan as the only province
            then gradually declined from 2000, reaching 1.8 [0.1; 5.1] in   with past/ongoing SRB inflation, we do not rule out the
            the 2011 – 2020 period. Consequently, as the cumulative result   possibility that the imbalanced SRB will emerge in other

            Volume 8 Issue 2 (2022)                         59                     https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v8i2.332
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70