Page 18 - IJPS-9-3
P. 18

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                   Barriers to learning at a U3A in Lebanon



            7. Conclusion: Now what?                           hardships, they spared some precious time for the interviews.
                                                               We also want to acknowledge the U3A’s administrative
            Although  far  from  inventing  the  wheel,  this  paper   team, who facilitated the data collection process.
            addressed existing dichotomies in understanding
            individual and structural barriers to older adult learning   Funding
            across situational, dispositional, and institutional levels. It
            shed light on the relatively underexplored barriers arising   This paper was partially funded by the European Union’s
            from social interactions among older learners at a U3A. It   Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the
            proposed a new definition of these barriers, at least within   Marie Skłodowska-Curie (Grant No. 754285).
            the  scope  of  this  study,  as  (un)intended  consequences
            to (inter)actions between institutional agents (learners,   Conflict of Interest
            teachers, and administrators)  — a perspective afforded   The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
            via Giddens’ structuration theory and its concepts of the
            duality of structure, latent and manifest functions of actions,   Author contributions
            but also reflexivity. The latter’s significance is clarified   Conceptualization: All authors
            in this conclusion as a tool for mitigating unintended   Formal analysis: All authors
            consequences and further examining latent functions to   Methodology: All authors
            actions enacted by older learners and other institutional   Writing – original draft: All authors
            agents, including so-called personal preferences, teaching   Writing – review and editing: All authors
            methods, curricula, and protocols.

              Embedding barriers in a structurationist perspective   Ethical approval and consent to participate
            calls for continuous reflexivity over one’s actions, attitudes,   Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional
            and beliefs and those of others within the U3A. Here, end-  Review Board, the American University of Beirut, Lebanon
            of-term or exit evaluations (Hachem & Vuopala, 2016;   (case# SBS-2020-0219) and the Swedish Etikprövning,
            Silverstein et al., 2002) may not change much, as institutional   Sweden (case# 2019-05121). Each participant signed an
            agents tend to responsibilize others instead of thinking of   online consent form.
            themselves as part of the problem and the solution. If older
            adult learning, and hopefully so, aims to empower older   Consent for publication
            learners, partially responsibilizing them and other agents at
            U3As is needed, unless the point is to treat them as clients   Consent was taken from participant before sit for an
            and consumers of educational experiences ceaselessly.   interview.
            Therefore, if U3As and HEIs strive to become age-friendly,   Availability of data
            they must create continuous educational channels and
            opportunities for dialog to increase reflexivity over barriers   Not applicable.
            and promote self- and social questioning on the interplay
            between individual actions and their significance on the   References
            structural level and their active role in inducing personal   Bjursell, C. (2019). Inclusion in education later in life: Why older
            and structural change.                                adults engage in education activities?  European  Journal  for
              Finally, future studies should examine how all      Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 10(3):215-230.
            institutional agents simultaneously experience barriers.      https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela20192
            The present study faced the limitation of solely examining   Boulton-Lewis, G., Aird, R., & Buys, L. (2016). Older Australians:
            the perspectives of older learners, whereby those     Structural barriers to learning in later life.  Current Aging
            teachers and administrators remain missing, even if   Science, 9(3):188-195.
            reported second-hand. One exciting research endeavor is      https://doi.org/10.2174/1874609809666160506122131
            investigating how institutional agents mitigate the barriers
            to older adult learning. Finally, apart from targeting older   Brady, E.M., Cardale, A., & Neidy J.C. (2013). The quest for
            learners, applying a structurationist perspective with non-  community in Osher lifelong learning institutes. Educational
            participant older people is another possible way forward.  Gerontology, 39(9):627-639.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2012.734147
            Acknowledgments
                                                               Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic
            The authors of this paper express gratitude to the study   analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health,
            participants from the U3A in Lebanon. Despite their   11(4):589-597.


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                         12                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.375
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23