Page 67 - ITPS-7-4
P. 67

INNOSC Theranostics and
            Pharmacological Sciences                                                     Role of saroglitazar in MASH



            active lipid species, including diglycerides, ceramides,   (vi) No history of significant alcohol consumption
            and sphingomyelins, as well as improve liver fibrosis and   (vii) No competing etiologies for hepatic steatosis
            inflammation biomarkers in mice with Western diet-  (viii) No co‐existing causes for chronic liver disease
            induced MASH. Saroglitazar has been shown in clinical   (ix) Having elevated AST/ALT levels along with liver
            trials to be useful for people with MASLD; however, there   stiffness value ≥7 kPa and/or liver  steatosis CAP
            are very few prospective studies dedicated to studying the   >238 dB/m, measured through liver FibroScan.
            role of saroglitazar in the management of MASLD/MASH.  Patients who received saroglitazar treatment for

            2. Materials and methods                           24 weeks and came for follow-up during and at the end of
                                                               therapy were analyzed.
            The current prospective observational study was conducted
            at the Max Hospital in Vaishali, Ghaziabad, India, a   2.3. Exclusion criteria
            tertiary care facility in northern India, for a duration of   Exclusions from our study included patients with a history
            6 months, from November 2024 to May 2023. The Indian   of type 2 diabetes or who had taken diabetic medications
            Council of Medical Research’s Good Clinical Practice and   within the 6  months before recruitment, dyslipidemia
            Declaration of Helsinki guidelines were adhered to in this   history, the presence of chronic hepatitis B or C infection
            investigation. A  total of 51 non-diabetic MASH patients   (positive HbsAg  or anti-HCV-ab),  evidence  of chronic
            (males and females, 18–75 years of age) were prospectively   liver disease on abdominal ultrasound and portal Doppler,
            followed up in this study. Diagnosis of MASH was done   significant  alcohol  intake  (>20  mg/day  for  males  and
            based on liver FibroScan (controlled attenuation parameter   >10  mg/day  for  females),  and  a  history  of  anti-obesity
            [CAP] score >238, liver stiffness measurement [LSM] value   medication intake in the 6  months before recruitment.
            >7kPa) along with raised liver enzymes (serum glutamic-  In addition, cases who were having a history of drug
            oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT], serum glutamic-pyruvic   use that resulted in hepatic steatosis/fibrosis including
            transaminase [SGPT] > upper value of normal limits).   psychotropic drugs, or cases with a history of hepatotoxic
            All of these 51 patients received 4 mg once-daily dose of   drug consumption were also excluded. Individuals with
            saroglitazar for the treatment of MASH from the hepatology   additional comorbid conditions such as hypothyroidism,
            and gastroenterology clinic of the hospital. In the current   ischemic illness, or chronic kidney disease were
            study, standard treatment protocols were used. Analysis of   excluded. The study also excluded the patients with any
            variance (ANOVA) test and multiple regression analysis   confounding factors that could cause the FibroScan values
            were used to assess the percentage change in body mass   to be overestimated, such as liver congestion, ascites,
            index (BMI), aspartate transaminase (AST), ALT, bilirubin,   liver inflammation from alcohol consumption or recent
            TG, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and LSM with CAP.  liver illness, benign or malignant liver tumors, biliary
                                                               obstructions,  etc.  Those with  a history  of  severe  illness
            2.1. Sample size calculation
                                                               or other conditions that would make the patient, in the
            Fifty patients were proposed for this study. The primary   investigator’s opinion, unsuitable for the study, such as
            outcome of interest is the change in ALT level from before   those who have a known allergy, sensitivity, or intolerance
            therapy to after therapy. This parameter gives a standard   to saroglitazar or formulation ingredients, women who
            deviation (SD) of 15.24 (δ = 15.24), which allows the   are pregnant, nursing, or who may become pregnant in
            detection of a change of at least δ = 5 unit/L. This indicates   the future but are not using appropriate contraceptive
            that the minimum sample size of 50 is required to ensure   measures, were also excluded from the study.
            the reliable detection of ALT level changes from before
            therapy to after therapy.                          2.4. Data collection method
                                                               All patients underwent general physical examination
            2.2. Inclusion criteria                            including recording of vitals. The patients were enrolled
            The participant inclusion criteria for this study are as   and  selected  as  per  inclusion  and  exclusion criteria.  If
            follows:                                           the patient was suffering from any  other concomitant
            (i)  Males or females                              diseases while receiving treatment for the same, the
            (ii)  18–75 years of age                           details were recorded in a case reporting form. The
            (iii) BMI ≥18.5 kg/m 2                             primary efficacy variable was the mean change in
            (iv)  Non-diabetics (fasting blood sugar <100 mg/dL, HbA1C   NAFLD fibrosis score at the end of the study (week 24)
               <5.7 and post-prandial blood sugar <140 mg/dL)  as compared with baseline; the mean change in TG, LDL,
            (v)  Confirmation of hepatic steatosis through imaging or   high-density lipoprotein, and cholesterol levels; and the
               histologic means                                mean change in liver function test (LFT) levels and BMI


            Volume 7 Issue 4 (2024)                         3                                doi: 10.36922/itps.3560
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72