Page 87 - JCAU-5-1
P. 87

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                      Revitalization through community empowerment



            and citizen control. Community empowerment is the way   social development; and second, exploring and revitalizing
            to achieve so by letting people get to know and realize their   the hidden recourses in the community is the fundamental
            ability to participate.                            path to resource-depleted community regeneration and
              Community empowerment has become an important    development.
            practice in urban regeneration in China today, though still   2. Literature review
            with some challenges. Small-scale participatory projects
            have emerged in China since the reform and opening-up   2.1. Urban transitions in China
            in the 1990s (Plummer & Taylor, 2013). However, in   There have been huge urban transitions in China since
            2011, Professor Zhang Xiaojun from Tsinghua University   the  1970s.  Urban  space  was  very  limited  due  to  the
            frankly stated that in most cases in China, it is “canjia”   backward economic development, the society was under
            rather than “canyu” (Nitzky, 2013). The difference between   collectivization, and it did not change until the Reform and
            “canjia,” which refers to taking part in or attending, and   Opening-up in 1978. Since early 1980s, a large amount of
            “canyu,” which refers to taking part in with contribution, is   countryside labors migrated into cities to earn their livings,
            whether participants’ opinions are actually considered. As   and the urbanization rate started to grow up. Satellite towns
            for present, whether community empowerment practices   were built to absorb the influx of population and private
            in  China  have  increased  “canyu”  and  achieved  better   capital  (Leaf,  1995).  With  economic  growth  and  private
            effects need to be further explored. In general, community   sector enlarging, urban development occurred at an even
            empowerment in the Asia-Pacific region faces many   higher speed in the 1990s and 2000s. Friedmann (2005)
            challenges, such as poorly organized governance, and   observed that personal autonomy and citizenship started
            imbalanced political structures, but it is currently gaining   to emerge during this time period in China. At the same
            momentum (Pawar, 2009).                            time, urban redevelopment in the inner city accelerated. In
              Among the various types of communities targeted   the 2010s, urban renewal projects started to be one of the
            for community empowerment work, one type of        most important kinds of project in cities, especially in large
            community has attracted particular attention from urban   cities such as Beijing.
            scholars, namely, the declining, inactive, and “forgotten”   Spectacles such as mega-events and festivals are
            communities. These communities are often economically   becoming the dominant tool and process in the
            disadvantaged, demographically declined, with little   production of urban space (Debord, 2012). Gotham
            identical local culture, and few voices heard in society.   (2005) believes that two major functions of spectacles
            Although the socioeconomic infrastructure of such   are profit making and bureaucratic control. Olympic
            communities is poor, they retain a great deal of social   Games – 2008 Summer Olympic Game and 2022 Winter
            capital and attachment to the local area (Johnstone &   Olympic Game – are two of the most influential and
            Lionais, 2004). They need community empowerment to   comprehensive mega-events held in Beijing in the past
            revitalize and drive local development.            20 years.
              This study focused on resource-depleted communities,
            using Shougang Laoshan Community in Beijing as a case,   2.2. The concept of community empowerment
            to explore how community empowerment can help them   Following the notion of participatory planning, the
            be revitalized. The study focused on the participatory   term “community empowerment” emerged in the 1980s.
            process of  community  regeneration and  the interaction   “Empower” means “the ability to choose” or “to increase
            between the different actors (mainly residents and the   one’s capacity to define, analyze, and act on one’s own
            people carrying out community empowerment activities,   problems” (Kent, 1988). One cannot “empower” others;
            in this case these people are planners), to understand the   one can only help others facilitate the process, reduce
            practical logic of community empowerment, and to draw   barriers, and enable others to “empower” themselves
            practical suggestions for community empowerment and   (Labonte, 1989). Community empowerment as a process
            local revitalization in resource-depleted communities   was initially associated with the concept of community
            with their characteristics. This paper provides some   development when  it  first emerged.  Laverack  (1999)
            fresh  first-hand experiences  and practical reflections  on   subdivided community empowerment into nine domains
            community regeneration in China, a detailed research   to guide the operation and evaluation of the practice. The
            case for academics, and it enriches the understanding of   nine domains are as follows: participation, leadership,
            the existing research by addressing two key ideas: first, it is   organizational structures, resource mobilization, problem
            necessary to carry out community empowerment with the   assessment, asking why, links with others, outside agents,
            professionals channeled to local level at this current stage of   and program management. Participation, and its closely


            Volume 5 Issue 1 (2023)                         2                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.0351
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92