Page 37 - JCAU-6-1
P. 37

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                              Perception of pedestrian environment



































                                                               Figure 3. The land use, routes, and tourist facilities in Gulangyu. Source:
                                                               Gaode Maps, 2023


                                                               factors were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
                                                               Subsequently, an ordered logistic regression analysis was
                                                               performed to develop model-fitting equations to test the
            Figure  2.  The three ferry terminals of Gulangyu. Source: Gaode   environmental factors that impacted the perceived rating.
            Maps,  2023
                                                               Similar methods were employed in Tan et al.’s study, where
                                                               correlation and logistic regression analysis were used to
            The questions in the questionnaire were formulated based   examine the relationship between walking behavior and
            on all the environmental items in Figure 4. The sample size   environmental factors (Tan et al., 2020).
            was determined using Krejcie and Morgan’s methodology
            (Krejcie & Morgan, 1970). Based on the number of residents   3.2.2. Conceptual framework
            (12.59 million) and tourists (2.21 million) in Gulangyu in
            2022, the sample sizes for residents and tourists were set   The relationship between environmental factors and
            at 370 and 384, respectively. The study selection criteria   walking  behavior  and  perception  has  been  verified  in
                                                               numerous studies. However, there is currently no scale fully
            required  a  random  selection  of  participants  rather  than
            a  specific  target  population.  During  the  survey  period   suitable for measuring the environmental factors of walking
            (January 2022–June 2022), 781 questionnaires were   in Chinese heritage cities. This research conducted a search
                                                               using keywords such as walking environment, walkability,
            distributed, and 753 valid questionnaires were returned.   walking landscape, and pedestrian, covering the period
            Of the valid questionnaires, 372 were from residents, with   between 2000 and 2020. Thirty-four relevant studies were
            279 respondents indicating leisure walking as their main   selected for analysis, and environmental factors affecting
            purpose of travel, and 381 were from tourists.
                                                               walking were extracted from their findings. Three studies,
              The questionnaire data were analyzed using SPSS   namely those by Arellana et al. (2020), Alfonzo (2005), and
            26.0  (2019) to verify the impact of various factors on   Ewing & Handy (2009), served as the primary references
            walking perception. Descriptive statistics and ordered   for selecting environmental elements for analysis. Based
            logistic regression analysis were employed to determine   on the literature review, the researchers identified five key
            the overall evaluation of residents’ and tourists’ perceptions   factors influencing the perception of walkers: Function,
            of the walking environment and the environmental factors   safety, comfort, esthetics, and pleasure. These factors were
            that influenced their evaluation. The demographic profile   further divided into 30 indicators based on the literature
            of the sample and the basic identification of environmental   and the characteristics of Chinese heritage cities. The


            Volume 6 Issue 1 (2024)                         5                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.1879
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42