Page 51 - JCAU-6-3
P. 51

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                                      Utilization of rural heritage




            Table 1. Results of the linear regression analysis of LS with RH, ESPL, WS, GVI, SVI, and R&PVI
            Model       Non-standardized   Standardized   t  Significant  Collinearity statistics  F-value  R 2  Durbin–
                          coefficient   coefficient                                                    Watson
                         B    Standard     β                       Tolerance  Variance
                                error                                       inflation factor
            LS
             (Constant)  42.271  12.892    -       3.589   0.002      -          -        3.787*  0.545  2.206
             RH         −0.110  0.196    −0.119    −0.564  0.580     0.540      1.852
             ESPL       0.335   0.129     0.476    2.594   0.018     0.712      1.404
             WS         −1.722  1.431    −0.223    −1.203  0.244     0.699      1.431
             GVI        −0.010  0.031    −0.067    −0.332  0.743     0.583      1.716
             SVI        −0.072  0.066    −0.223    −1.093  0.288     0.576      1.737
             R&PVI      −0.011  0.054    −0.034    −0.202  0.842     0.872      1.147
            Notes: *Indicates the correlation coefficient was significant at the p<0.05.
            Abbreviations: CVI: Construction view index; ESPL: Equivalent sound pressure level; GVI: Green view index; LS: Level of stress; R&PVI: Road and
            pavement view index; RH: Relative humidity; SVI: Sky view index; T : Air temperature; WS: Wind speed.
                                                        a
            correlation between the sample data points and enhancing   significantly positively correlated with pedestrian walking
            the overall model validity. Regarding the significance   pleasure (Gao & Dong, 2023; Wu et al., 2017; Yang et al.,
            of individual regression coefficients, ESPL exhibits a   2009). However, in rural heritage tourism sites, especially
            significant positive effect on LS, with a coefficient value   in historic towns, the correlation between ESPL, R&PVI,
            of 0.335 (t = 2.594; p = 0.018 [<0.05]). However, RH, SVI,   and CVI and tourists’ stress levels surpasses that of GVI.
            and R&PVI do not demonstrate a statistically significant   This result may be attributed to the frequent positioning
            relationship with LS, as their coefficient values exceed   of historic towns on the outskirts of urban areas, where
            0.05. To summarize, the analysis highlights the significant   tourists have already experienced the transition from urban
            influence of ESPL on LS. Therefore, in subsequent spatial   to natural landscapes en route to the site, thereby elevating
            optimization, focusing on the optimization of the acoustic   their emotional thresholds toward natural landscapes.
            environment in public spaces is necessary.           However, the distinctive feature of historic towns in

            4. Discussion                                      rural heritage sites lies in the predominance of cultural
                                                               landscapes, comprising traditional dwellings and streets
            Initially, when using the Kriging interpolation method   rather than natural scenery. In this study, the roads and
            in ArcGIS Pro to visualize the spatial distribution of   buildings associated with R&PVI and CVI are exclusively
            spatial perceptual element data and tourist stress data,   artificial structures. It is evident that tourists in historic
            several noteworthy observations emerge. The circular   towns perceive cultural landscapes to a greater extent than
            pattern observed in the LS distribution validates previous   natural ones. In addition, the positive correlation between
            research, which emphasizes the dynamic nature of tourists’   ESPL and LS indicates that within the context of historic
            experiences (Fallon & Schofield, 2006; Wang et al., 2019).   towns, experiencing the spatial ambiance elicits more
            Subsequently, it becomes evident that areas predominantly   positive emotions among tourists than simply appreciating
            characterized by rural dwellings exhibit higher LS compared   the visual scenery. Hence, it is evident that design methods
            to those dominated by natural landscapes. This finding   for urban renewal or rural human settlement improvement
            aligns with the assertion made by (Chen et al., 2023; Luo   cannot be directly applied to the spatial optimization of
            et al., 2021) that panoramic views incorporating forests   historic towns. Designers and managers should prioritize
            and integrated residential areas significantly contribute to   the creation of a pleasant spatial ambiance in public spaces
            stress recovery and evoke low-intensity pleasure emotions   and ensure proper maintenance of historic towns, which
            among tourists.                                    can enhance the perception and preference for the rural
              In addition, correlation analyses were conducted using   environment, thereby attracting people to relieve pressure
            SPSS to explore the relationship between physical and   in the town.
            visual environment elements and stress data. On the one   Finally, this study performed a linear regression
            hand, the results diverge from those of spatial perception   analysis  of  RH,  ESPL,  WS,  GVI,  SVI,  R&PVI,  and  LS.
            studies conducted in urban areas. In such studies, GVI was   ESPL was found to significantly and positively affect stress,


            Volume 6 Issue 3 (2024)                         12                       https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.2481
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56