Page 127 - JCAU-7-2
P. 127

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                      Heritage tourism: Personal and collective factors




            Table 3. Results of the validity test
            Dimension               Cronbach’s alpha   Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin         Bartlett’s test of sphericity
                                      coefficient     sampling adequacy  Approximate   Degrees of   Significance
                                                                         Chi‑square     freedom        test
            Community embeddedness      0.739              0.735           561.825        45           0.000
            Value perception            0.768              0.796           484.546        45           0.000
            Local emotion               0.734              0.719           452.476        45           0.000
            Behavioral intention        0.715              0.723           471.865        45           0.000
            Population level            0.780              0.813          2,607.201       496          0.000

            Table 4. Model fitting results
            Indicator                Absolute fit indicator      Incremental fit index     Parsimonious fit index
            Specific classification  χ /df  RMSEA     GFI      IFI          CFI         PGFI         PNFI
                                 2
            Assessment criteria   <3       <0.08      >0.9     >0.9         >0.9        >0.5          >0.5
            Fitting effect       2.267     0.079      0.939    0.912       0.907        0.604        0.597
            Notes: CFI: Comparative fit index; GFI: Goodness-of-fit index; IFI: Incremental fit index; PGFI: Parsimonious goodness-of-fit index;
            PNFI: Parsimonious normed fit index; RMSEA: Root mean square error of approximation.

            Table 5. Path analysis results
            Path                                    Path coefficient  Standard error   Critical ratio  p‑value
            Community embeddedness→Value perception     0.526            0.138            3.804         <0.001
            Behavioral intention→Local emotion          0.902            0.127            7.094         <0.001
            Community embeddedness→Behavioral intention  0.606           0.134            4.507         <0.001
            Local emotion→Behavioral intention          0.408            0.109            3.722         <0.001



























                                   Figure 3. Structural equation modeling results. Source: Diagram by the authors.

            cultural heritage had a more pronounced impact, with path   likely to develop a robust emotional connection  to
            coefficients of 0.655 and 0.682, respectively, compared to   their community. This emotional attachment may stem
            the coefficient of 0.315 for social values. These findings   from their deep-rooted connection to cultural heritage,
            suggest that residents with a deeper comprehension of   recognized as a representation of communal identity and
            the cultural and economic values of heritage are more   historical legacy.


            Volume 7 Issue 2 (2025)                         9                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.5739
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132