Page 54 - JCAU-7-3
P. 54

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                                 Rural–urban village regeneration


































            Figure 2. Partial land boundary map for Demarcation District (D.D.) 326 in Shui Hau village
            Source: Government map by the villagers.
            land boundaries and mistaken registration of squatter   Under the Cap. 121 Buildings Ordinance (Application to
            structures.                                        the New Territories) Ordinance, male indigenous villagers aged
                                                               18 or older are eligible to apply for a “Ding” (丁; male offspring)
            4.2. SHP for indigenous villagers                  right to  construct a  small  house  with  specific controlled
            Before the implementation of the aforementioned    dimensions (i.e., a  maximum roofed-over  area of 700  sqft,
            leasehold and taxation system, the N.T. functioned as a   a height of 27 ft, and no more than 3 stories). This type of
            series of self-sufficient agrarian economies, and there were   small house is classified as a New Territories Exempted House
            vigorous conflicts between the Punti clans and the colonial   (NTEH), meaning its construction is exempted from specific
            government, including the Six-Day War of 1899 (Hase,   provisions and regulations under the Buildings Ordinance,
            2008, p. 43). The N.T. served as a buffer zone between the   such as the requirement to obtain approval and consent
            British colony and China until the 1950s, when a post-war   from  the  authority  (i.e.,  Buildings  Department)  before  the
            population boom, driven by an influx of immigrants from   commencement of works. Indigenous villagers may also apply
            China, necessitated large-scale industrial and residential   for a private treaty grant to build houses on government lands
            development.                                       within village environs if private land is unavailable. Overall,
              To facilitate this development, the government proposed   the SHP is a development-oriented and gender-discriminatory
            the construction of new towns in the N.T. and started   policy  that  has  resulted  in  the  inefficient  utilization  of  land
            resuming large amounts of land from indigenous villagers,   resources among privileged indigenous villagers (Ma, 2016).
            offering compensation. In the later years, however, many   4.3. Development-oriented planning
            villagers found it difficult to afford government lands for
            building village houses. With assistance from Heung Yee   To indigenous villagers,  Ding rights are considered
            Kuk, the statutory advisory body for indigenous villagers,   inherited wealth from their ancestors. The demand for
            a policy for building small houses in rural areas was swiftly   building small houses has consistently grown. In 2016, the
            drafted and introduced in 1972. This policy, later known   Heung Yek Kuk estimated there were 240,000 potential
            as the SHP, was initially regarded as a political strategy to   applications, though whether this  figure reflected actual
            facilitate colonial administration (Tang  et al., 2005) and   housing needs remains questionable. Earlier research
            as a reward for the Heung Yee Kuk’s in maintaining order   revealed that 47% of successful applications from 1997 to
            during the 1967 riots (Ma, 2016). However, it has arguably   2002 involved requests to remove restrictions on house
            resulted  in  fundamentally  biased  priorities  favoring   (re)sales, indicating systemic abuse of the SHP for profit-
            indigenous villagers.                              making purposes (Ma, 2016ibid). Precedents show that


            Volume 7 Issue 3 (2025)                         5                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.4992
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59