Page 110 - JCBP-3-1
P. 110

Journal of Clinical and
            Basic Psychosomatics                                         Concerns about COVID-19 vaccination and AE rate



            the AE rates in the placebo groups were high after the   the susceptibility to nocebo effects, we did not include the
            first dose.  In retrospect, the AEs that occurred during the   Q-No questionnaire. For example, the questionnaire asks
                    2
            registration trials were interpreted as being associated with   whether patients read the summary of drug characteristics
            nocebo effects. 11-13                              before consuming it. 16,17  This behavior may favor the
              Nocebo effects are verifiable (neurophysiologically and   development of nocebo effects or be considered normal by
            clinically) and can lead to life-threatening situations.    medical personnel and for new vaccines. Questionnaires
                                                        6,10
            Thus, downplaying nocebo effects as imaginary and not   completed by the same person were linked using a
            concerning is wrong and contrary to scientific knowledge.   pseudonymization  code. Once entered into  a  database,
            In non-interventional studies, the placebo arm is missing.   the data were completely anonymized and analyzed. The
            Therefore, nocebo effects cannot be directly distinguished   study has been registered with the Deutsches Register
            from side effects. Nocebo effects could change a vaccine’s   Klinischer Studien (German Register Clinical Studies, No:
            safety classification in clinical trials, which is highly   DRKS00027976) and was approved by the review board of
            relevant.  Placebo and nocebo effects are more likely   PMU Nuremberg (No: IRB 2022_003; February 2, 2022).
                   8,14
            to  develop  during  treatment  initiation.   The  frequency   2.1. Statistical analysis
                                            6-9
            of adverse events after COVID-19 vaccinations varied in
            studies,  predictors  for  vaccination  side  effects  could  not   Data were checked for incorrect entries. Fisher’s exact
            be determined. 15,16  However, no study has investigated   and Pearson’s Chi-square tests were used to analyze cross-
            concerns regarding a nocebo effect before the first dose.   tabulations. These tests were best suited to compare the
            Herein, we investigated the association between concerns   frequency of side effects in different groups (our sample
                                                                                                            18
            regarding the course of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and   vs. registration study sample; subgroups of our sample).
            the prevalence rate of AEs in healthcare workers (HCWs).  The significance level was 5%. No correction was made
                                                               for multiple testing. All analyses were performed using
            2. Methods                                         STATISTICA (version 13; Hill, T. & Lewicki, P. Statistics:
            All employees of the Nuremberg Hospital – one of the   Methods and Applications. StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) and
            largest municipal hospitals in Europe providing the   NCSS (version 2022; NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, UT, USA).
            highest care – who were vaccinated as of December 27,   3. Results
            2020 (start of COVID-19 vaccinations in prioritized
            individuals in Germany) were invited to volunteer in this   Our cohort comprised 78% women (18 – 35 years: 25%;
            pharmacovigilance study. There were no special inclusion   36 – 50 years: 35%; and >51 years: 40%) and 22% men (18
            or exclusion criteria. Questionnaires were available at   – 35 years: 29%; 36 – 50 years: 29%; and > 51 years: 41%).
            the two vaccination centers of the hospital, as well as   Allergies were the most common pre-existing condition
            online, and included all previously identified AEs.  We   in both sexes (women: 53%; men: 50%), followed by
                                                      2
            analyzed the prevalence of AEs after the first dose of an   cardiovascular (women: 11.5%; men: 12%) and thyroid
            mRNA vaccine (total  n = 982; Comirnaty BNT162b2:   (women: 11.5%; men: 2.8%) diseases. Mental illnesses
            n = 596). The participants were asked to report any   were rarely reported (women: 1.5%; men: 1.7%). In total,
            AEs that developed within 1 week of the first dose. The   25% of the women and 20% of the men were smokers. The
            participants selected  the symptoms in  the questionnaire   prevalence of obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m²) was
            that  applied  to  them  and  classified them according  to   14% among women and 10% among men.
            their intensity – mild, moderate, or severe. Completed   Fatigue, headache, and myalgia were the most common
            questionnaires could  either  be  physically  submitted  in   systemic AEs after the first vaccine dose. Fatigue, headache,
            prepared boxes or returned via internal mail. There were   chills, and vomiting developed significantly less frequently
            no  special  requests to  fill  out the  questionnaires  from   in patients aged <55 years in our study than in those in the
            memory,  for  example,  2  –  3  weeks  after  vaccination,  to   registration study for Comirnaty (Table 1).
            avoid recall bias. The questionnaire included an empty field
            for personal comments and perceived AEs not listed in the   HCWs who reported concerns regarding the
            questionnaire. The questionnaire did not include questions   vaccination course (n = 180) were significantly more likely
            regarding professional affiliation. Patients vaccinated with   to exhibit systemic AEs (80% vs. 68%) after the first mRNA
            mRNA vaccines were predominantly medical professions   vaccine dose than those who reported no concerns (n = 605;
            (mostly nurses) directly involved in the care of patients   Figure 1). Women were significantly more worried than
            with COVID-19. The participant’s anamnestic data were   men (27.5% vs. 10%, P < 0.05). After the second dose, the
            collected, and they were asked if they were worried about   AE rates were not significantly different between the two
            the vaccination course (Answers: Yes or No). To assess   groups.


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                        104                              doi: 10.36922/jcbp.4727
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115