Page 69 - JCBP-3-3
P. 69

Journal of Clinical and
            Basic Psychosomatics                                            Depression and chronic pancreatitis: MR study



               doi: 10.1002/sim.3034                              and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol.
                                                                  2015;44(2):512-525.
            18.  Howard DM, Adams MJ, Clarke TK, et al. Genome-wide
               meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent      doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080
               variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal
               brain regions. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(3):343-352.  29.  Brion MJ, Shakhbazov K, Visscher PM. Calculating
                                                                  statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J
               doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0326-7                     Epidemiol. 2013;42(5):1497-14501.
            19.  Mao X, Mao S, Sun H, et al. Causal associations between      doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt179
               modifiable risk factors and pancreatitis: A comprehensive
               Mendelian  randomization  study.  Front  Immunol.   30.  Burgess S, Thompson SG. Multivariable Mendelian
               2023;14:1091780.                                   randomization: The use of pleiotropic genetic variants to
                                                                  estimate causal effects. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(4):251-260.
               doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1091780
                                                                  doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu283
            20.  Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR,  et al.
               Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in   31.  Rees JMB, Wood AM, Burgess S. Extending the MR-Egger
               epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR):   method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to
               explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2021;375:n2233.  correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy. Stat
                                                                  Med. 2017;36(29):4705-4718.
               doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2233
                                                                  doi: 10.1002/sim.7492
            21.  Skrivankova  VW,  Richmond  RC,  Woolf  BAR,  et al.
               Strengthening the reporting of observational studies   32.  Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of
               in epidemiology using mendelian randomization: The   widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships
               STROBE-MR statement. JAMA. 2021;326(16):1614-1621.  inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex
                                                                  traits and diseases. Nat Genet. 2018;50(5):693-698.
               doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18236
                                                                  doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7
            22.  Wray NR, Ripke S, Mattheisen M,  et al. Genome-wide
               association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine   33.  Carter AR, Sanderson E, Hammerton G, et al. Mendelian
               the genetic architecture of major depression.  Nat Genet.   randomisation for mediation analysis: Current methods
               2018;50(5):668-681.                                and challenges for implementation.  Eur J Epidemiol.
                                                                  2021;36(5):465-478.
               doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0090-3
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1
            23.  Howard DM, Adams MJ, Shirali M,  et  al. Genome-wide
               association study of depression phenotypes in UK Biobank   34.  Richardson TG, Sanderson E, Palmer TM, et al. Evaluating
               identifies variants in excitatory synaptic pathways. Nat   the relationship between circulating lipoprotein lipids and
               Commun. 2018;9(1):1470.                            apolipoproteins with risk of coronary heart disease: A
                                                                  multivariable Mendelian randomisation analysis. PLoS Med.
               doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03819-3                    2020;17(3):e1003062.
            24.  Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P,  et al. FinnGen provides      doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003062
               genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population.
               Nature. 2023;613(7944):508-518.                 35.  Liu M, Jiang Y, Wedow R,  et al. Association studies of
                                                                  up to 1.2 million individuals yield new insights into the
               doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05473-8                    genetic etiology of tobacco and alcohol use.  Nat Genet.
            25.  Hart PA, Conwell DL. Chronic pancreatitis: Managing a   2019;51(2):237-244.
               difficult disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(1):49-55.     doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0307-5
               doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000421              36.  Xue A, Wu Y, Zhu Z, et al. Genome-wide association analyses
            26.  Palmer TM, Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, et al. Using multiple   identify 143 risk variants and putative regulatory mechanisms
               genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk   for type 2 diabetes. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2941.
               factors. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012;21(3):223-242.     doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04951-w
               doi: 10.1177/0962280210394459                   37.  Yuan  S,  Giovannucci  EL, Larsson SC.  Gallstone
            28.  Burgess S, Thompson SG. Interpreting findings from   disease, diabetes, calcium, triglycerides, smoking and
               Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur   alcohol  consumption  and  pancreatitis  risk:  Mendelian
               J Epidemiol. 2017;32(5):377-389.                   randomization study. NPJ Genom Med. 2021;6(1):27.
               doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x                     doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00189-6
            27.  Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian   38.  Rich KL, Abu-El-Haija M, Nathan JD, Lynch-Jordan A. The
               randomization with invalid instruments: Effect estimation   role of psychology in the care of children with pancreatitis.


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2025)                         63                              doi: 10.36922/jcbp.5892
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74