Page 117 - JCTR-11-5

Journal of Clinical and
Translational Research Predicting coordinator workload with adapted OPAL

Funding conceptualized by artificial intelligence.

This project was supported in part by the National Center References
for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National
Institutes of Health under Award Numbers UL1TR002378, 1. Getz KA, Campo RA. New benchmarks characterizing
UL1 TR001450, and UM1 TR005294, and by the National growth in protocol design complexity. Ther Innov Regul Sci.
2018;52(1):22-28.
Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities under
Award Number 1U24MD015970. The content is solely doi: 10.1177/2168479017713039
the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily 2. Getz KA, Wenger J, Campo RA, Seguine ES, Kaitin KI.
represent the official views of the National Institutes of Assessing the impact of protocol design changes on clinical
Health. trial performance. Am J Ther. 2008;15(5):450-457.
Conflict of interest doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31816b9027
3. Florence Healthcare. Clinical Trial Complexity Index
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Report; 2023. Available from: https://florencehc.com/
Author contributions resources/clinical-trial-complexity-index [Last accessed on
2025 Apr 20].
Conceptualization: Kesley Holmes 4. Florence Healthcare. Complexity Costs: Hidden Tolls in
Formal analysis: Kesley Holmes, Muhammed Idris, Daniel Clinical Trial Operations; 2023. https://florencehc.com/
Brinton resources/complexity-costs [Last accessed on 2025 Apr 20].
Investigation: Kesley Holmes, Jan Morgan Billingslea 5. Gwede CK, Johnsson DJ, Roberts C, Cantor AB. Burnout
Methodology: Kesley Holmes, Muhammed Idris in clinical research coordinators in the United States. Oncol
Writing–original draft: All authors Nurs Forum. 2005;32(6):1123-1130.
Writing–review & editing: All authors
doi: 10.1188/05.onf.1123-1130
Ethics approval and consent to participate 6. Speicher LA, Fromell G, Avery S, et al. The critical need
Not applicable. for academic health centers to assess the training, support,
and career development requirements of clinical research
Consent for publication coordinators: Recommendations from the clinical and
translational science award research coordinator taskforce.
Not applicable. Clin Transl Sci. 2012;5(6):470-475.
Availability of data doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00423.x
7. Morin DJ. Harmonizing protocol complexity with resource
Data are available from the corresponding author on management and capacity planning at clinical research sites.
reasonable request. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020;54:978-987.

Further disclosure doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00120-8
A portion of the findings included in this manuscript was 8. Smuck B, Bettello P, Berghout K, et al. Ontario protocol
previously presented as a poster at the Southeast Clinical assessment level: Clinical trial complexity rating tool for
workload planning in oncology clinical trials. J Oncol Pract.
and Translational Science Alliance Conference held in 2011;7(2):80-84.
Pine Mountain, Georgia, United States, in March 2025.
The presentation, titled “A validation study of the adapted doi: 10.1200/JOP.2010.000051
OPAL workload estimation tool,” shared preliminary 9. Tyson K, Harvey J, Forney L, Brinton D. Resource
results from the study to facilitate scholarly discussion management and capacity planning for clinical trial sites.
and obtain feedback. The content has since been expanded J Clin Transl Res. 2024;10(4):229-236.
and refined for this manuscript submission. The poster doi: 10.36922/jctr.24.00022
has not been published or released by the conference
organizers. In addition, this paper was polished and edited 10. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement
Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use.
with the assistance of artificial intelligence-powered tools, 5 ed. Oxford: Oxford Academic; 2015.
th
specifically ChatGPT and Grammarly. These tools were
used solely to enhance clarity, grammar, and formatting. doi: 10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001
All content, analyses, and ideas are original and authored 11. Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for
by the researchers; the project was not generated or Reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS). J Clin

Volume 11 Issue 5 (2025) 111 doi: 10.36922/JCTR025260032