Page 40 - JCTR-9-5
P. 40

342                       Xu et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2023; 9(5): 340-346






















        Figure 1. Illustrative schematic displaying cervical and distal spinal sagittal parameters: C0-1 CA, C1-2 CA, C0-2 CA, C2-7 CA, and C2-7 SVA, NT,
        TS, TIA, TK, LL, SS, PT, PI, and C7-S1 SVA.
        Abbreviations: C0-1 CA: C0-1 Cobb angle; C1-2 CA: C1-2 Cobb angle; C0-2 CA: C0-2 Cobb angle; C2-7 CA: C2-7 Cobb angle; C2-7 SVA: C2-7
        sagittal vertical axis; NT: Neck tilt; TS: T1 slope; TIA: Thoracic inlet angle; TK: Thoracic kyphosis; LL: Lumbar lordosis; SS: Sacral slope; PT: Pelvic
        tilt; PI: Pelvic incidence; C7-S1 SVA: C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis.

        Table 1. Demographic data of the four groups
        Characteristic      Group A: ≤20 years     Group B: 21 – 40 years    Group C: 41 – 60 years    Group D: ≥61 years
                                 N=32                    N=32                      N=32                    N=32
        Male                      18                      17                        13                      17
        Female                    14                      15                        19                      15
        BMI (kg/m )             17.7±1.4                23.6±6.6                  26.9±5.5                26.8±6.6
               2
        Age (years)             14.0±4.4                34.1±5.5                  48.7±4.8                66.5±5.4
        BMI: Body mass index
        Table 2. Values of spinal sagittal alignment parameters in the four groups
        Radiographic    Group A: ≤20 years   Group B: 21 – 40 years  Group C: 41 – 60 years  Group D: ≥61 years  P‑value
        parameter            N=32                  N=32                   N=32                 N=32
        C0-1 CA             12.5±6.9              9.3±10.8               13.5±4.6             13.5±7.4          0.096
        C1-2 CA             −20.4±5.6            −20.7±10.2             −24.0±5.9             −24.8±5.8        0.025*
        C0-2 CA             −7.1±6.1             −11.5±8.4              −10.5±6.2             −11.3±7.2        0.050*
        C2-7 CA             −7.9±8.2             −6.5±10.3              −13.1±8.0            −17.0±10.1        0.000**
        C2-7 SVA            20.1±9.1             18.2±10.6               20.3±8.2             25.7±10.9        0.018*
        NT                  41.4±6.9              47.3±9.7               50.5±8.8             51.1±10.6        0.000**
        TS                  22.1±5.1              20.3±5.7               23.8±4.9             27.1±8.8         0.000**
        TIA                 63.5±9.8              67.6±9.5               74.2±8.3             78.2±11.8        0.000**
        TK                  36.0±7.2              38.6±8.1               42.5±7.7             48.3±10.9        0.000**
        LL                 −50.5±10.5            −42.0±9.8              −44.4±9.6            −42.1±13.4        0.007**
        SS                  34.6±7.3              32.4±8.4               31.9±7.3             28.6±7.4         0.019**
        PT                   7.9±8.5              12.9±8.1              13.7±10.7             18.1±7.8         0.000**
        PI                  42.6±8.2             45.3±11.1              45.5±12.7             46.7±11.6         0.502
        C7-S1 SVA           −7.3±31.0             2.7±28.5              −8.5±24.7             28.4±43.3        0.000**
        *P<0.05; **P<0.01.
        Abbreviations:  C0-1  CA:  C0-1  Cobb  angle;  C1-2  CA:  C1-2  Cobb  angle;  C0-2  CA:  C0-2  Cobb  angle;  C2-7  CA:  C2-7  Cobb  angle;  C2-7  SVA:  C2-7  sagittal  vertical  axis;
        NT: Neck tilt; TS: T1 slope; TIA: Thoracic inlet angle; TK: Thoracic kyphosis; LL: Lumbar lordosis; SS: Sacral slope; PT: Pelvic tilt; PI: Pelvic incidence; C7-S1 SVA: C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis

        0.581 (P = 0.000), and finally, the coefficients between TS and   Pearson correlation coefficient between TIA and TK was 0.448
        TK were 0.443 (P = 0.011), 0.664 (P = 0.000), 0.529 (P = 0.002),   (P  =  0.010),  0.486  (P  =  0.005),  0.382  (P  =  0.031),  and  0.479
        and  0.757  (P  =  0.000).  The  correlations  between  the  above-  (P = 0.006), exposing significant differences among groups, but
        mentioned  cervical  parameters  and  distal  spinal  parameters   no trend was noted. The correlations between cervical and distal
        showed an increasing trend with age (Figure 2). In addition, the   spinal parameters in the four groups are displayed in Table 3.
                                          DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18053/jctres.09.202305.23-00059
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45