Page 6 - JCTR-9-6
P. 6

370                       Sempere-Rubio et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2023; 9(6): 369-380
        system disturbances, and alterations in the quality of sleep [1].   It is therefore that the main aim of this umbrella review was to
        Several investigations have suggested that one of the mechanisms   assess the effectiveness of HEIs in patients with FMS.
        that  may  be  involved  in  the  FMS is a  process of central
        hyperexcitability  [2,3].  This  process  involves  an  amplification   2. Methods
        of  signaling  at  the  neuronal  level  in  the  medullary  and   This study was conducted  in accordance  with the Preferred
        supramedullary centers, which may lead to increased sensitivity   Reporting Items for Overviews of SR including harm checklist
        to  pain,  lowering  the  excitability  threshold  of  afferent  sensory   (PRIO-harms), which consists of 27 items (56 sub-items), followed
        inputs with painful information [4]. On an epidemiological level,   by  a  5-stage  process  flow  diagram  (identification,  screening,
        FMS has a prevalence in the general population between 0.5%   eligibility, inclusion, and separation of relevant studies) [24]. This
        and 5% [5]. The prevalence is higher in women than in men [5].   review was previously registered in the international prospective
        Regarding mortality, the recent study conducted by  Treister-  register of SR: PROSPERO (CRD42022368068).
        Goltzman and Peleg [6] showed  that FMS  is associated with
        an  increased  mortality  rate  from  all  causes,  especially  suicidal   2.1. Review inclusion criteria
        ideation, accidents, and the presence of infections.       The inclusion criteria  employed in this article  were based
          Nowadays, there seems to be no objective test that can help
        clinicians  make  an accurate  pathophysiological  diagnosis of   on methodological  and clinical  factors such as population,
                                                                intervention, control, outcomes, and study design [25].
        FMS  [7].  To date, most of the tools and criteria  used for the
        diagnosis of FMS are vaguely specific [8]. This situation, together   2.1.1. Population
        with  the  difficulty  of  subclassifying  patients  with  FMS,  poses
        a huge challenge when treating patients with FMS [8]. Despite   The participants selected  for the articles  were patients  with
        this, in 2016 the  American  College  of Rheumatology  (ACR)   FMS. Included  SR had to  explicitly  state  that  they  included
        established some criteria [9]. In the revised 2016 ACR criteria,   patients with FMS in their inclusion criteria. We excluded all SR
        generalized pain (rather than widespread pain) in at least four of   that include patients with other chronic conditions with persistent
        five distinct body regions is required for a diagnosis of FMS along   pain.
        with persistent symptoms for more than 3 months, and also high   2.1.2. Intervention and control
        scores on indices of widespread pain and symptom severity [9].
          Regarding  the  treatment  of  FMS,  the  effectiveness  of  some   The intervention consisted of HEI (PNE) (i.e.: Neurophysiology
        treatments has been evaluated. For example, previous systematic   of pain, differences between “pain” and “nociception”, factors
        reviews (SR) have assessed the effectiveness of some important   contributing  to  the  perpetuation  of  pain,  or  the  influence  of
        interventions  such as pharmacological  treatment  [10,11],   thoughts (cognitions) or emotions on pain experience), PNpE (i.e.:
        psychological  therapies  [12,13] as well as exercise-based   neurophysiology of the central nervous system, central/peripheral
        interventions [14,15] to manage the described main symptoms of   hyperexcitability  or sensitization/habituation  concepts), and
        FMS. However, most of the clinical interventions evaluated do not   therapeutic  education  (TE)  (i.e.: FMS symptoms information,
        incorporate educational features in them. Education is fundamental   active coping strategies, or self-management strategies) conducted
        in the management of patients with persistent pain, as it improves   in isolation, in conjunction or combined with other treatments. The
        the  influence  of  psychosocial  variables  that  can  modulate  pain   education sessions could be individual or group-based and could
        perception  [16].  Within  the biopsychosocial  perspective,  some   contain any semantic resources for a better understanding (such as
        health educational interventions (HEI) have been proposed as an   the presence of metaphors). Interventions based on psychological
        alternative, with the aim of reconceptualizing the pain experience,   treatment or cognitive behavioral therapy were excluded from the
        improving coping strategies toward pain, or improving knowledge   study. The comparator groups used the following interventions:
        regarding the disease process to improve some clinical variables   no intervention, minimal interventions in isolation or combined
        of interest such as disability and quality of life in patients with   to  form  a multicomponent  approach.  (e.g.:  information  about
        FMS. Educational strategies such as pain neuroscience education   relaxation,  analgesic  drugs, therapeutic  exercise,  or exercises
        (PNE) or pain neurophysiology education (PNpE) are among the   information booklets), or waiting list.
        most studied educational interventions for patients with persistent   Regarding the intervention studied:
        pain [17,18]. The number of research studies evaluating the effect   •   TE is a therapeutic modality that explicitly involves a non-
        of HEI on patients with FMS has grown in recent years [19-23],   directional  dynamic  interaction with the patient,  based on
        and so far, no research studies have pooled and analyzed these   a  biobehavioral paradigm,  which  includes  educational  or
        results. Moreover, the SR published so far are not consistent   training  activities  that promote learning  and acquisition  of
        with the results obtained. We believe that a general overview that   adaptive skills to improve self-management and knowledge
        encompasses all of them allows us to analyze the effectiveness   that  facilitate  changes  in  beliefs,  attitudes,  and behaviors
        of these interventions in depth, as well as to analyze and extract   associated  with disability.  TE aims to change maladaptive
        possible lines of improvement so that research may continue to be   beliefs,  reconceptualize  aspects  related  to  pain,  implement
        carried out in the near future.                             educational  processes on the  importance  of therapeutic


                                          DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18053/jctres.09.202306.23-00108
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11