Page 51 - MI-2-2
P. 51

Microbes & Immunity                                                                Probiotics & obesity



              Human vs. animal models.  Jucker   discussed  how   •   Bridging the gap between animal and human research
                                            30
            physiological differences between humans and animals   through translational studies that enhance clinical
            hinder the direct translation of results. As a result, animal   relevance.
            models may not fully replicate human disease mechanisms.   •   Developing personalized probiotic therapies that
            This discrepancy impacts the applicability of findings to   account for individual gut microbiome variations and
            clinical practice.                                    host responses.
              Small sample sizes and short follow‑ups.  Many   •   Integrating diet and lifestyle factors into probiotic
            studies have been reported to have a limited number of   intervention strategies to maximize their effectiveness.
            participants and brief follow-up periods. These constraints   Future research efforts focused on these areas will
            reduce statistical power and the reliability of conclusions.   enhance our understanding of probiotics and their role in
            Therefore, longer and larger studies are needed to generate   metabolic health, ultimately improving clinical applications
            stronger evidence. 31
              Variability in probiotic strains and dosages. Differences in   7. Conclusion
            probiotic types, dosages, and study conditions impact study   This systematic review emphasizes the growing body of
            outcomes. In addition, inconsistent protocols make it difficult   evidence supporting the potential of probiotics, particularly
            to determine the most effective formulations. Therefore,   those from the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium,
            standardization is essential for improved reproducibility. 32  as promising therapeutic agents for managing obesity and
              Publication bias and confounding factors. Bias in research   its associated comorbidities. The studies included in this
            can arise from selective reporting and publication bias,   review demonstrated significant effects of probiotics on gut
            where studies with positive results are more likely to be   microbiota modulation, enhanced production of SCFAs,
            published, leading to an overestimation of treatment effects.  improved glycemic control, and reductions in body weight,
                                                               BMI, and fat mass. Specific strains, such as L. plantarum
              In addition, uncontrolled variables such as diet, lifestyle,   NCHBL-004 and combinations of  Lactobacillus with
            and genetics  can significantly  influence  study outcomes.   Bifidobacterium, have shown notable benefits in weight
            For  instance, genetic  predispositions can  affect eating   loss and metabolic health, as well as improvements in gut
            behaviors, which in turn impact health-related research   microbiota diversity. However, the interpretation of these
            findings.  These factors underscore the importance of   promising results is limited by several factors, including
                   33
            rigorous study design and comprehensive data analysis to   variations in study designs, reliance on animal models, and
            ensure reliable and valid conclusions.
                                                               small sample sizes in human trials. The interaction between
            6. Key unresolved issues and future                probiotic dosage, pre-existing gut microbiota composition,
            direction                                          and individual responses further highlights the need for
                                                               personalized approaches to probiotic treatment.
            The following key unresolved issues require deeper
            investigation in future research: the long-term effects of   Acknowledgments
            probiotics on obesity; optimal strain combinations and   None.
            dosages for maximum efficacy; a mechanistic understanding
            of how probiotics influence obesity and related metabolic   Funding
            pathways; the role of diet, lifestyle, and host genetics in
            modulating probiotic effects; and inconsistencies between   None.
            animal and human study outcomes.                   Conflict of interest
              To address these challenges, the following research
            directions should be prioritized:                  The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
            •   Conducting long-term clinical trials to evaluate   Author contributions
               the sustained effects of probiotics on obesity and
               metabolic health.                               Conceptualization: All authors
            •   Establishing standardized probiotic strains and   Formal analysis: Krishnaraj Narayanan, Jz Kamille Eclarin,
               dosages to ensure consistency and reproducibility   Alec Arbona
               across studies.                                 Writing – original draft: Krishnaraj Narayanan, Jz Kamille
            •   Utilizing multi-omics approaches (e.g., metagenomics,   Eclarin, Alec Arbona
               metabolomics, transcriptomics) to uncover the   Writing – review & editing: Krishnaraj Narayanan, Jz Kamille
               underlying mechanisms of probiotic action.         Eclarin, Alec Arbona, Nagendran Tharmalingam


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         43                               doi: 10.36922/mi.8358
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56