Page 30 - MSAM-2-1
P. 30

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                               Fast fiber orientation optimization




            Table 1. Comparison of the two optimization methods
             Comparison criteria                    Direct optimization (NLPQL)            Fast layering optimization
            Computation time                                > 5 h                                 16 s
            Resulting layering                         −30°/6°/0°/−9°/20°/                 −2°/−28°/−20°/−15°/−11°/
                                                       −2°/−3°/14°/−4°/−33°                  −6°/6°/12°/−2°/−2°
            Resulting maximal displacement               4.9554 × 10  m                     5.4166 × 10  m (+9%)
                                                                                                    −5
                                                                −5
            NLPQL: Non-linear Programming Quadratic Line Search




















                                         Figure 10. Force-displacement curves of the six tested parts.













            Figure 11. Convergence of the direct optimization model.

            found. Then, this sequence was repeated 6 times to fill the
            geometry of the wrench.
              A simulation on a part with the directly optimized
            angle sequence showed that the stiffness of the wrench   Figure  12. Displacement fields of the two compared wrenches: direct
            is only 9% higher than the wrench obtained with our   optimized (top) and quick optimized (bottom).
            quick method, with a much higher computation time
            (Figure  12  and  Table  1).  If  finding  the  best  solution  is   Hence, our quick method is a good compromise between
            requested, the NLPQL method is suitable but, if the goal   performance and design time, as it led to a part that is
            is to quickly find an improved solution, the approach   only 9% less stiff than the optimal part within a minimal
            proposed in this paper is a good compromise between   computation time.
            computation time and the search for the best solution. It   4. Conclusions
            is also important to note that this comparison was possible
            because the case was close to a 2D case. A more complex   A  method  to  quickly  optimize  the  fiber’s  orientations
            case would be harder to optimize with a gradient method   of a MEX-manufactured continuous fiber-reinforced
            due to the number of design parameters it would require.   composite was implemented with the finite element
            Ansys Workbench software, which was used for this study,   method in the Ansys Mechanical environment of
            limits, for example, the number of parameters to 20 for   programming. The use of stack-based model helped to
            automatically computed Design of Experiments.      reduce the numerical simulation time, which made the


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023)                         7                        https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.49
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35