Page 72 - MSAM-2-3
P. 72

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                         Additive manufacturing of SiC composite



            interface. This does not facilitate the stress transfer   The second cycle  of PIP is  the onset  of  densification
            during load bearing of the composite, thus weakening the   of the ceramic-based composite specimens, and the most
            mechanical properties of the composite.            significant weight gain of the composite is observed at
                                                               this stage. Figure 18 shows the SEM and energy dispersive
              Figure 17 illustrates the basic state of the specimen after   spectroscopy (EDS) results of the specimens after the
            the first cycle of PIP treatment: the carbon fiber skeleton is   second PIP treatment. As shown in Figure 17, the SiC phase
            the main phase with large SiC phase covering the surface,   also started to appear in the areas that were previously
            while there is basically no SiC production inside the fiber   blocked by the resin. In addition to the large SiC generated
            bundle. This is due to the fact that the resin in the green   in the first cycle, the specimen surface also displayed small
            parts prevents the infiltration of the ceramic precursor   and fine SiC. According to Figure 18F and 18H, the SiC
            slurry, resulting in very little SiC production inside the   had already started to be generated inside the fiber bundle.
            fiber bundle, which is significantly different from the   Figure  19A shows the X-ray diffraction analysis
            pre-carbonized  C /SiC  (PETG)  composites  as  shown  in   (XRD) results of the specimens during the PIP process,
                          f
            Figure 14C and 14D.                                and it can be seen that the XRD results of both the first-
                                                               cycle and second-cycle PIPs did not clearly show the SiC
                                                               characteristic  peaks  due  to  the  low  SiC  content  in  the
            A                      B                           samples. However, the characteristic peak of β-SiC could
                                                               be found in the XRD pattern of the ninth-cycle PIP, but
                                                               the peak intensity was not high. It is presumed that this is
                                                               due to the fact that the maximum temperature of the PIP
                                                               process in this study was controlled at 1100°C, which is
                                                               lower  than the  stable  growth  temperature  of  α-SiC  and
                                                               β-SiC, and most of the SiC phases with amorphous forms
            C                      D                           were obtained. In addition, Figure 19B shows the results
                                                               of EDS elemental analysis of the C /SiC specimen after the
                                                                                          f
                                                               nine-cycle PIP, which is dominated by C and Si elements
                                                               and also contains a trace amount of O elements, which
                                                               should be introduced during the PIP process or SEM
                                                               testing, and the results confirmed the generation of SiC,
                                                               which is consistent with the XRD results.
            Figure  16. Scanning electron microscope results of polylactic acid-  3.2.3. Mechanical properties of the C /SiC composites
                                                                                              f
            based green part first-cycle PIP-treated specimens. (A) The macroscopic
            hole. (B) The cross-section of the specimen. (C) The surface of the part.   The three-point bending test specimens were cut into a
            (D) The interface of the sample.                   specimen size of 40 mm × 4 mm × 3 mm using a diamond
                         A                       B                       C










                         D                       E                       F









            Figure 17. Scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) results of polylactic acid-based green parts first-cycle precursor
            infiltration pyrolysis-treated specimens. (A–C) scanning electron microscope photos of specimen cross-section and surface. (D) Single fiber attached with
            a small amount of SiC. EDS surface scan results of (E) C element distribution and (F) Si element distribution for single fiber area.


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         11                      https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1604
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77