Page 85 - MSAM-4-1
P. 85

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                        SLM of ODS steel: Process and properties



            operating (720°C) temperatures are presented in Figure 7
            and Table 3. The results of the tests conducted on specimens
            produced without pre-heating are not presented. This
            decision is due to the presence of a significant number of
            cracks in the specimens, which made the tests invalid.

              The as-built SLM ODS specimens exhibited a brittle
            behavior. At room temperature, fracture occurred at 978
            MPa with no evidence of plastic deformation before fracture.
            This UTS value was comparable to the values for the similar
            ferritic/martensitic ODS steel plates and tubes manufactured
            through powder metallurgy (UTS = 991 MPa),  but the
                                                  40
            problem was YS and elongation was absent. Following
            heat treatment, the mechanical response of the SLM ODS   Figure 8. Fracture surfaces of samples after SLM without and with heat
            specimens during tensile transition to a ductile mode. The YS   treatment after tensile testing at 20°C and 720°C. Magnification: ×100
            and UTS achieved were lower than the base steel produced   Abbreviation: SLM: Selective laser melting
            through powder metallurgy techniques (YS = 525 MPa, UTS
            = 711 MPa, ε = 16%).  The elongation of the heat-treated   Table 3. Tensile properties of specimens fabricated in the
                             41
            SLM ODS specimens remained significantly lower than that   present work
            of the powder metallurgy-derived base material. The findings
            revealed the substantial impact of incorporating 0.25 wt.%   Condition  Temperature, °C  YS, MPa  UTS, MPa  ε, %
            Y O  on the tensile properties. In a prior investigation of   SLM ODS  20   -      978±24     -
             2
               3
            base steel produced by SLM, the maximum tensile strength         720       266±2   272±2   7.7±0.1
            was also observed for the specimen after SLM without heat   SLM   20      440±14   697±25  8.6±0.2
            treatment. The UTS was 567 MPa, aligning with the absence   ODS+HT  720    144±8   156±5   29.3±0.3
            of plastic characteristics.  Consequently, the incorporation
                               38
            of Y O  resulted in a 72% increase in UTS compared to the   Abbreviations: ε: Elongation; HT: Heat treatment; ODS: Oxide
                                                               dispersion-strengthened; SLM: Selective laser melting; UTS: Ultimate
                 3
               2
            base steel.                                        tensile strength; YS: Yield strength.
              The mechanical properties of heat-treated SLM
            samples, when tested at elevated temperatures, were not   cases, no visible cracks, inclusions, or unmelted powder
            very significant. The tensile properties of the material   particles were detected.
            tested at 720°C after SLM were comparable to those of
            base steel obtained by powder metallurgy methods (YS   The results of the microhardness measurements
            = 279 MPa, UTS = 284 MPa,  ε = 25%).  However, the   supported the conclusions regarding the quenched state
                                              41
            elongation was much lower. The relatively low ductility of   of the material after SLM. The sample produced without
            all specimens after SLM can be explained by the quenched   pre-heating exhibited a value of microhardness of 441 ±
            state and internal stresses.                       23 HV. The application of pre-heating was found to result
                                                               in a reduction of material internal stresses by decreasing
              Fractography was used to study the fracture surfaces of   the thermal gradient, thereby leading to a decrease in
            the specimens. From Figure 8, it can be observed that the   microhardness to 390 ± 20 HV. After heat treatment, a
            SLM specimen tested at 20°C exhibited an undeveloped   microhardness of 288 ± 26 HV was measured.
            fracture surface. The fracture occurred without necking,
            and the fracture mode appears to be of an intergranular   These results underscore the need for a change in the
            nature. The specimen, after heat treatment, featured a more   heat treatment mode after SLM. The selected heat treatment
            developed fracture surface with a few cleavage platforms   mode was found to exert a negative impact on the tensile
            and a number of dimples. As the specimen after SLM   properties of the material. The results of the study indicated
            underwent tensile testing at 720°C, its fracture surface   the formation of a quenched structure in as-built material
            exhibited a significant increment in the number of dimples   and subsequent quenching within the heat treatment did
            of a lower size. The fracture character of the specimens is   not have a positive effect on the structure. Despite the lower
            classified as higher ductility, accompanied by the presence   values of average grain length and width, the specimens
            of brittle fracture areas. The specimen after SLM and heat   after heat treatment exhibited lower UTS values. During
            treatment tested at 720°C had dimples and micro-voids, an   the heat treatment process, which involves quenching
            indication of the ductile nature of the fracture. In all the   and high-temperature annealing, a recrystallization


            Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)                         8                         doi: 10.36922/MSAM025060004
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90