Page 115 - MSAM-4-2
P. 115

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                        Impact of cell angle on AlSi10Mg structures



            indicate the ability of each structure to resist deformation,   P90 demonstrates a ~7.22% increase in peak force over
            with Dodeca-C exhibiting the highest resistance among the   Octa-A P90. However, this advantage is offset by a notable
            Dodeca structures at 80% porosity in Figure 9A, followed   reduction in both total energy absorption and SEA, which
            by Dodeca-B, whereas Dodeca-A demonstrates the lowest   decline by ~11.7% and ~10.9%, respectively (Figure  10B).
            resistance. Among the Octa structures in  Figure  9C,   Consequently, when considering the performance metrics
            Octa-A P80 displays superior resistance compared to   of  the structures,  Octa-A P90  is  deemed  superior despite
            Octa-B P80. In addition, at this impact energy level, the   its lower peak force. The observed performance variations
            structure with 90% porosity in Figure 9B and D undergoes   can be attributed to differences in load distribution and
            rapid deformation and transitions to a dense state, whereas   deformation mechanisms inherent to each design, which will
            the  structure  with  80%  porosity  does  not  experience   be investigated later through numerical simulation analysis.
            this  change.  This  distinction  suggests  the  critical  role   Figure  11 compares the specific strength of Dodeca
            of optimizing porosity in determining the mechanical   and Octa structures at 80% porosity, revealing distinct
            response of lightweight structures under impact loading.  performance trends governed by topology-driven

              Thus, further comparisons of the peak force, energy   mechanical behavior. Among the Dodeca structures,
            absorption, and SEA for various structures with 90%   Dodeca-C P80 exhibits the highest specific strength,
            porosity are presented in Figure 10. Among the Dodeca   significantly surpassing both Dodeca-A P80 and Dodeca-B
            structures in  Figure  10A, Dodeca-B P90 exhibits the   P80. This enhancement suggests that Dodeca-C’s single-unit
            highest peak force at ~3.53 kN, representing a ~33.5%   cell orientation architecture optimizes stress redistribution.
            improvement  over  Dodeca-A  P90.  Following  closely,   In contrast, within the Octa series, Octa-A P80 exhibits
            Dodeca-C P90 achieves a peak force of ~3.26 kN, indicating   a higher specific strength than Octa-B P80, confirming
            a ~23.5% enhancement compared to Dodeca-A P90. When   that the single-unit cell orientation does not enhance the
            evaluating energy absorption, both energy absorption and   performance of Octa-B. Notably, both Octa structures
            SEA metrics reveal significant performance differences   outperform  their  Dodeca  counterparts,  indicating  that
            among the structures. The Dodeca-C P90 structure   Octa  lattice  frameworks  offer  superior  strength-to-mass
            demonstrates substantial increases in both metrics compared   ratios. The observed hierarchy in specific strength aligns
            to the Dodeca-A P90, with enhancements of ~18.9% in   closely with the energy absorption characteristics, where
            total energy absorption and ~17.1% in SEA. In contrast,   Dodeca-C and Octa-A emerge as the most mechanically
            Dodeca-B P90 shows modest improvements, with increases   efficient structures within their respective categories.
            of only ~2.3% and ~1.7%, respectively. Although Dodeca-C
            P90 does not have the highest peak force, its superior   3.2.3. Influence of unit cell orientation under high
            energy absorption profile positions it as the best performer   impact energy (248 J)
            among the Dodeca P90 structures. The notable increase in   The sustained energy absorption capacity of porous
            energy absorption for Dodeca-C indicates that optimizing   structures during high-impact events is also vital for
            single-unit cell orientation can effectively enhance the   applications that require enhanced impact resistance. This
            balance between the strength and ductility of the Dodeca   section presents the results of high-impact tests conducted
            structures.  For the  Octa structures  in  Figure  10B, Octa-B   on Dodeca P80 and Octa P80 structures exhibiting

                         A                                 B

















            Figure 10. Peak force, energy absorption, and SEA under impact loading at an energy level of 124 J for various LPBF-built AlSi10Mg porous materials with
            90% porosity. (A) Dodeca structures and (B) Octa structures
            Abbreviations: Dodeca: Dodecahedral; Octa: Octahedral; SEA: Specific energy absorption; LPBF: Laser powder bed fusion


            Volume 4 Issue 2 (2025)                         11                        doi: 10.36922/MSAM025130019
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120