Page 112 - MSAM-4-2
P. 112

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                        Impact of cell angle on AlSi10Mg structures



            properties, as well as corrosion performance 31,56,57  for   all samples were produced using identical materials and
            AlSi10Mg and other alloys. Figures 6D and E further show   processing parameters. Accordingly, in this study, consistent
            the SEM microstructure of LPBF-fabricated AlSi10Mg   LPBF parameters resulted in comparable material density
            samples at low and high magnifications. The SEM images   and surface roughness across all structures. Consequently,
            reveal three typical distinct microstructural regions: the   the discrepancies in mechanical behavior identified in this
            melt pool region, the coarse-grain zone, and the heat-  investigation are primarily attributed to variations in unit
            affected zone (Figure 6D). The microstructure exhibits a   cell structure, single-unit cell rotation angles, and porosity
            significant presence of network-like cellular structures   level. The subsequent section will examine the dynamic
            enriched with silicon (Figure 6E), which is consistent with   response of these structures, focusing on the effects of
            the findings reported by Liu et al.  and other literature.    varying impact energy levels, porosities, and single-unit cell
                                                         42
                                       58
            Specifically, during LPBF of AlSi10Mg, rapid solidification   rotation angles on impact performance.
            promotes silicon segregation along the cellular boundaries
            of the  α-Al matrix, forming a silicon-rich eutectic   3.2.1. Effects of varying impact energies on fracture
            network.  Variations in the size and morphology of   behavior
                   51
            this network have been shown to significantly influence   Distinguishing the effect of varying impact energies on
            mechanical performance. 59                         the dynamic mechanical behavior of porous structures
                                                               is critical for understanding their transient impact
            3.2. Dynamic response analysis                     resistance and potential applications.  In this study,
                                                                                               4
            Based on the above discussion, the X-CT results reveal that   the Dodeca-A structure with 80% porosity (Dodeca-A
            the actual volume and dimensions of the samples fabricated   P80) was first selected for the M1 and M2 impact tests
            through LPBF closely align with the theoretical design   (Table 2) to systematically investigate its mechanical
            specifications. Furthermore, densification measurements   response under varying impact loading conditions.
            confirm the successful fabrication of LPBF-built AlSi10Mg   Force-displacement  and  energy-displacement  curves
            porous structures with varying unit cell rotations and   were analyzed to characterize the deformation and
            similar microstructures. The influence of structural porosity   energy absorption behavior of the structure, offering key
            errors and material defects induced by the LPBF process   insights into its damage evolution, as shown in Figure 7A
            on mechanical behavior is not considered in this study, as   and  B, respectively. The results indicate that the linear


                         A                      B                        C










                         D                                   E















            Figure 6. Quality and microstructure of material manufacturing (A) Macroscopic surface of the LPBF-built AlSi10Mg lattice strut regions observed using
            scanning electron microscopy. Scale bar: 200 μm, magnification: 75×. (B) MP tracks and morphology, exhibiting few irregular pores. (C) Schematic diagram
            of the scanning strategy used in LPBF. (D) Microstructure of the sample at low magnification. Scale bar: 10 μm, magnification: 2000×. (E) Microstructure
            of the sample at high magnification, highlighting network-like cellular structures enriched with Si. Scale bars: 500 nm and 2 μm, magnification: 22000×,
            9500×
            Abbreviations: CGZ: Coarse-grain zone; HAZ: Heat-affected zone; MP: Melt pool; LPBF: Laser powder bed fusion; Si: Silicon


            Volume 4 Issue 2 (2025)                         8                         doi: 10.36922/MSAM025130019
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117