Page 117 - MSAM-4-3
P. 117

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing              Sustainable manufacturing composite material optimization



            and process monitoring. In this study, a twin-screw   3D  printer  to dynamically optimize  process parameters,
            extruder was utilized to manufacture TPU 95A filaments,   thereby minimizing the need for manual parameter
            with real-time energy consumption tracked using a power   tuning. By combining data-driven AI models and expert-
            meter. This allows sustainability measures to be closely   driven MCDM techniques, this study presents a logical
            tied into the MCDM framework. Experimental data from   and  sustainable  decision-making  approach  for  FDM-
            mechanical testing and energy monitoring served as   based impeller production, with enhanced process efficacy,
            inputs to the Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model, with each metric   material utilization, productivity, and environmental
            carefully analyzed to determine the optimum process   performance. The architecture of the implemented ANN
            conditions.  By  applying  the  hybrid  MCDM  approach,   model is illustrated in Figure 6, illustrating the data flow
            optimal trade-offs among mechanical strength, energy   from FDM parameters to predicted mechanical and
            efficiency, and print accuracy were achieved, facilitating   energy-related outputs.
            high-performance, sustainable manufacturing of impellers.
            The Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model was integrated with AI   3. Results and discussion
            regression techniques, making it more appropriate for   Mechanical performance, energy consumption, and
            handling a vast array of impeller geometries and materials.   AI-MCDM optimization of FDM-based 3D-printed TPU
            The model incorporates real-time sensor feedback from the   95A impellers were comprehensively examined. All aspects
                                                               of  the process,  from  filament  extrusion to  3D  printing
                                                               and mechanical testing, were meticulously monitored
                                                               for energy consumption to evaluate overall sustainability.
                                                               Optimization of FDM printing parameters, such as layer
                                                               thickness, infill density, shell thickness, and print speed,
                                                               was performed using AI-based predictive modeling and
                                                               MCDM methods, namely, Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. The
                                                               mechanical properties of the impellers were evaluated
                                                               through tensile, flexural, and compressive tests, while wear
                                                               resistance was assessed using a pin-on-disc tribometer. The
                                                               findings indicate that increasing shell thickness and infill
                                                               density enhances wear resistance and mechanical strength,
                                                               but also increases energy consumption. Therefore, an
                                                               optimal trade-off strategy must be identified to achieve
                                                               sustainable manufacturing. The test results are presented
                                                               in Table 1.
            Figure  4. Scatter plot  comparing  artificial intelligence-predicted  and   The mechanical characteristics of TPU 95A impellers
            experimentally measured compression strength
                                                               were determined based on the infill density and shell
                                                               thickness from  the  tensile,  flexural,  and compression
                                                               strength tests. Sample S1, with a layer thickness of 0.1 mm,
                                                               infill density of 20%, and a shell thickness of 0.8  mm,
                                                               exhibited poor mechanical properties, characterized by


















            Figure  5. Scatter plot  comparing  artificial intelligence-predicted  and   Figure  6. Architecture of the artificial neural network model used
            experimentally measured wear rates                 in this study


            Volume 4 Issue 3 (2025)                         9                         doi: 10.36922/MSAM025200033
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122