Page 35 - AC-2-2
P. 35

Arts & Communication                                                           Identification of Pollock Art



            27.  Shamir L, Macura T, Orlov N, Eckley DM, Goldberg IG.   34.  Stork DG. Computer Vision and Computer Graphics
               Impressionism, expressionism, surrealism: Automated   Analysis of Paintings and Drawings: An Introduction to the
               recognition of painters and schools of art. ACM Trans Appl   Literature. In: International Conference on Computer Analysis
               Percept. 2010;7(2):1-17.                           of Images and Patterns. Netherlands: Springer; 2009. p. 9-24.
               doi: 10.1145/1670671.1670672                       doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-03767-2_2
            28.  Shamir L, Nissel J, Winner E. Distinguishing between   35.  Tamura H, Mori S, Yamawaki T. Textural features
               abstract art by artists vs. children and animals: Comparison   corresponding to visual perception.  IEEE  Trans Syst Man
               between human and machine perception. ACM Trans Appl   Cybernet. 1978;8(6):460-473.
               Percept. 2016;13(3):1-17.
                                                               36.  Tan WR, Chan CS, Aguirre HE, Tanaka K. Ceci N’est Pas
               doi: 10.1145/2912125                               Une  Pipe:  A  Deep  Convolutional  Network  for  Fine-art
                                                                  Paintings  Classification.  In:  IEEE International Conference
            29.  Shamir L, Orlov N, Goldberg IG. Evaluation of the
               Informativeness of Multi-order Image Transforms. In:   on Image Processing. New Jersey: IEEE; 2016. p. 3703-3707.
               International Conference on Image Processing, Computer   37.  Taylor RP, Guzman R, Martin T,  et al. Authenticating
               Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2009. p. 37-42.    Pollock paintings using  fractal geometry.  Pattern  Recogn
                                                                  Lett, 2007;28(6):695-702.
            30.  Shamir L, Orlov N, Eckley DM, Macura T, Johnston J,
               Goldberg IG. Wndchrm-an open source utility for biological      doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2006.08.012
               image analysis. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3(1):13.
                                                               38.  Taylor RP, Micolich AP, Jonas D. Fractal analysis of Pollock’s
               doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-3-13                        drip paintings. Nature, 1999;399(6735):422.
            31.  Solomon D. Jackson Pollock: A  Biography. Maryland:   39.  Teague MR. Image analysis via the general theory of
               Rowman and Littlefield; 2001.                      moments. J Opt Soc Am. 1980;70(8):920-930.
            32.  Solso RL. The cognitive neuroscience of art: A preliminary      doi: 10.1364/JOSA.70.000920
               fMRI observation. J Conscious Stud. 2000;7(8-9):75-86.
                                                               40.  Wu CM, Chen YC, Hsieh KS. Texture features for
            33.  Solso RL. Brain activities in a skilled versus a novice artist:   classification of ultrasonic liver images.  IEEE Trans Med
               An fMRI study. Leonardo. 2001;34(1):31-34.         Imaging. 1992;11(2):141-152.
               doi: 10.1162/002409401300052479                    doi: 10.1109/42.141636








































            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2024)                         9                                 doi: 10.36922/ac.1628
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40