Page 66 - AC-2-2

Arts & Communication Dialogue of painting and cinema in The Age of Innocence

of worldviews and philosophical concepts actualized in doi: 10.1515/9781503626072
cinema. The analogies between various styles of painting 9. Leutrat JL. Qu’est que c’est que cette histoire? In: Bellour R,
and cinematic scenes drawn in the research of The Age of editor. Cinéma et Peinture-Approches. Paris: Presses
Innocence indicate the congruence of visual models of the Universitaires de France; 1990. p. 123-135.
world generated in different art forms and subsequently 10. Costa A. Cinema e Pittura. Freeport, IL: Loescher; 1991.
lead to a deeper understanding of the universal language
of visual art. 11. Felleman S. Real Objects in Unreal Situations: Modern Art in
Fiction Films. Bristol: Intellect Ltd.; 2014.
Acknowledgments 12. Dalle Vacche A, editor. The Visual Turn. Classical Film
None. Theory and Art History. New Brunswick: Rutgers University
Press; 2003.
Funding 13. Peucker B. Incorporating Images: Film and the Rival Arts.
None. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1995.
14. Sager Eidt LM. Writing and Filming the Painting: Ekphrasis
Conflict of interest in Literature and Film. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 2008.
The author declares no competing interests. 15. Jost F. Le picto-film. In: Bellour R, editor. Cinéma et
Peinture-Approches. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France;
Author contributions 1990. p. 109-122.
This is a single-authored article. 16. Bonitzer P. Décadrages: Cinéma et Peinture. Paris: Editions
de l’Etoile; 1985.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
17. Jameson F. The Geopolitical Aesthetic: Cinema and Space in
Not applicable. the World System. Bloomington: Bloomington University
Press; 1992.
Consent for publication
18. Aldouby H. Federico Fellini: Painting in Film, Painting on
Not applicable. Film. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2013.
Availability of data doi: 10.3138/9781442669581-004
Not applicable. 19. Bakhtin M. Discourse in the novel. In: Holquist M, editor.
The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin.
References Austin: University of Texas Press; 1981. p. 259-422.
1. Scorsese M. Hugo. UK/France: GK Films; 2011. 20. Pethó Á. The garden of intermedial delights: Cinematic
‘adaptations’ of bosch, from modernism to the postmedia
2. Canudo R. The birth of a sixth art. In: Abel R, editor. French age. Screen. 2014;55(4):471-489.
Film Theory and Criticism: A History/Anthology, 1907-1939.
Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993. doi: 10.1093/screen/hju036
3. Eisenstein S. The Film Sense. Boston: Harcourt; 1942. 21. Bolter JD, Grusin R. Remediation: Understanding New
Media. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2000.
4. Pethó Á. Intermediality in film: A historiography of
methodologies. Acta Univ Sapientiae Film Media Stud. 22. Spielmann Y. Intermedialität. Das System Peter Greenaway.
2010;2:39-72. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag; 1998.
5. Felleman S. Art in the Cinematic Imagination. Austin: 23. Paech J. Literatur und Film. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler Verlag;
University of Texas Press; 2006. 1988.
6. Dalle Vacche A. Cinema and Painting: How Art is Used in 24. Bonfand A. Le Cinéma Saturé: Essai sur les Relations de la
Film. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1996. Peinture et des Images en Movement. Paris: Epiméthée, PUF;
2007.
7. Peucker B. Tableau vivant in film: Intermediality and the
real. In: Schröter J, Paech J, editors. Intermedialität: Analog/ doi: 10.3366/film.2008.0020
Digital. Theorien, Methoden, Analysen. Paderborn: Wilhelm 25. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil
Fink; 2008. p. 291-300. Blackwell Ltd.; 1958.
doi: 10.30965/9783846743744_021 26. Pivovarov D. Operational aspect of the language structure.
8. Peucker B. The Material Image: Art and the Real in Film. In: Problems of Logic and Methodology of Science. Moscow:
Redwood City: Stanford University Press; 2007. Nauka Press; 1981. p. 246-256.

Volume 2 Issue 2 (2024) 10 doi: 10.36922/ac.2090