Page 9 - AC-3-2

Arts & Communication Augmented reality in mathematics education

Based on these criteria, we screened the titles, abstracts, 2.2. Papers collected
and keywords of the 545 studies, which resulted in 25 studies, Following our screening process, we analyzed the remaining
five of which were further excluded because the full texts of
three were unavailable and two did not respond to our research 20 studies according to our classification scheme, which is
questions. We then examined the full texts of the remaining described below.
20 studies in our systematic review. The screening process was 2.2.1. Utility, application, and effectiveness of AR in
conducted manually based on the Scopus database results.
mathematical education
Of the studies not included, 95 were rejected because
they were published outside the 2017 – 2024 period. At first, we were interested in the publication year of these
A further 363 were rejected because they were not related papers. Of the 20 studies reviewed from 2017 through
to mathematics education, and 62 were rejected due to the 2024, most (15) were published from 2020 and beyond
language and type of the document (Figure 1). (Figure 2).

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram

Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025) 3 doi: 10.36922/ac.4446