Page 14 - AC-3-3

Arts & Communication Immersive curatorial practice

Availability of data How to Transform Communities Using Local Assets, Arts, and
Culture. United States: Turner Publishing Company; 2006.
Not applicable.
11. Lim L, Lee HK, editors. Routledge Handbook of Cultural and
References Creative Industries in Asia. United Kingdom: Routledge;
2019.
1. Riches S, Maskey R, Waddingham R, et al. Altered states
of consciousness: Evaluation of a voice-hearing simulation 12. Vermeeren AP, Calvi L, Sabiescu A, et al. Future museum
during an immersive art exhibition. Early Interv Psychiatry. experience design: Crowds, ecosystems and novel
2018;12(5):947-950. technologies. In: Springer Series on Cultural Computing.
Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 1-16.
doi: 10.1111/eip.12497
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58550-5_1
2. Chang CW. The Cognitive Study of Immersive Experience in
Science and Art Exhibition. In: International Conference on 13. Beale K. Museums at Play: Games, Interaction and Learning.
Human-Computer Interaction. Cham, Switzerland. Springer Edinburgh, Scotland: MuseumsEtc; 2011.
International Publishing; 2021. p. 369-387. 14. Hill K, editor. Museums and Biographies: Stories, Objects,
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78114-9_25 Identities. Vol. 9. United Kingdom: Boydell & Brewer Ltd.; 2014.
3. Murao M. Designing Immersive Art Experience-An doi: 10.1515/9781846159756-002
Exploration of Visuals and Sounds [Doctoral dissertation]. 15. Paris SG, Mercer MJ. Finding self in objects: Identity
Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2022. exploration in museums. In: Learning Conversations in
4. Zhang H. Zhang Daqian: A world-renowned artist. China Museums. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2003. p. 405-427.
World Cult Exch. 2012;12:18-23. doi: 10.4324/9781410606624-19
5. Menton S. Authenticity and the copy: Analyzing Western 16. Falk JH, Dierking LD. The Museum Experience Revisited.
connoisseurship of Chinese painting through the works of United Kingdom: Routledge; 2016.
Zhang Daqian. Art Bull. 2014;96(2):45-60.
doi: 10.4324/9781315417851-19
6. Song Y. Valuing Collaboration in Art: Insights From Zhang
Daqian’s Network. Université Libre de Bruxelles-Solvay 17. Haywood N, Cairns P. Engagement with an interactive
Brussels School of Economics and Management, Centre Emile museum exhibit. In: People and Computers XIX-The Bigger
Bernheim de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Gestion; 2024. Picture: Proceedings of HCI 2005. London: Springer; 2006.
p. 113-129.
7. Zhang Y, Dang R, Li Y, Meng X. A comparative study of early
and late painting styles in Zhang Daqian’s lotus works. IEEE doi: 10.1007/1-84628-249-7_8
Access. 2024;12:73676-73690. 18. Serrell B. Exhibit Labels: An Interpretive Approach. 2 ed.
nd
doi: 10.1109/access.2024.3404415 Lanham, Maryland, U.S: Rowman & Littlefield; 2015.
8. Tao XJ. 传统与现代: 张大千绘画观的嬗变 [Traditional 19. Cameron F, Kelly L, editors. Hot Topics, Public Culture,
and modern: The evolution of Zhang Daqian’s painting Museums. United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing;
concept]. 学术研究 [Acad Res]. 2020;7:43-49. 2020.
9. Phipps M. Exhibit Labels: An Interpretive Approach. Lanham, doi: 10.4324/9781315420011-28
Maryland, U.S: Rowman & Littlefield; 2018. 20. Vom Lehn D, Heath C. Accounting for new technology in
10. Borrup T. The Creative Community Builder’s Handbook: museum exhibitions. Int J Arts Manag. 2005;7:11-21.

Volume 3 Issue 3 (2025) 8 doi: 10.36922/ac.3377