Page 21 - AIH-1-1

Artificial Intelligence in Health AI in prostate cancer detection

and radiomic features. Eur Radiol, 30: 6757–6769. 74. Li M, Chen T, Zhao W, et al., 2020, Radiomics prediction
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07064-5 model for the improved diagnosis of clinically significant
prostate cancer on biparametric MRI. Quant Imaging Med
67. Corradini D, Brizi L, Gaudiano C, et al., 2021, Challenges in Surg, 10: 368–379.
the use of artificial intelligence for prostate cancer diagnosis
from multiparametric imaging data. Cancers (Basel), 13: 3944. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2019.12.06
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13163944 75. Liang L, Zhi X, Sun Y, et al., 2021, A nomogram based
on a multiparametric ultrasound radiomics model for
68. Abdelmaksoud IR, Shalaby A, Mahmoud A, et al., 2021, discrimination between malignant and benign prostate
Precise identification of prostate cancer from DWI using lesions. Front Oncol, 11: 610785.
transfer learning. Sensors (Basel), 21: 3664.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.610785
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113664
76. Li W, Li J, Sarma KV, et al., 2018, Path R-CNN for prostate
69. Donisi L, Cesarelli G, Castaldo A, et al., 2021, A combined cancer diagnosis and gleason grading of histological images.
radiomics and machine learning approach to distinguish IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 38: 945–954.
clinically significant prostate lesions on a publicly available
MRI dataset. J Imaging, 7: 215. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2875868
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7100215 77. Harmon SA, Tuncer S, Sanford T, et al., 2019, Artificial
intelligence at the intersection of pathology and radiology in
70. Leo P, Lee G, Shih NN, et al., 2016, Evaluating stability of
histomorphometric features across scanner and staining prostate cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol, 25: 183–188.
variations: Prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2019.19125
images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham), 3: 047502.
78. Hou Y, Bao ML, Wu CJ, et al., 2020, A radiomics machine
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.047502 learning-based redefining score robustly identifies clinically
71. Kwak JT, Hewitt SM, 2017b, Multiview boosting digital significant prostate cancer in equivocal PI-RADS score 3
pathology analysis of prostate cancer. Comput Methods lesions. Abdom Radiol (NY), 45: 4223–4234.
Programs Biomed, 142: 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02678-1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.02.023 79. Lim CS, Abreu-Gomez J, Thornhill R, et al., 2021, Utility of
72. Kwak, JT, Hewitt SM, 2017a, Nuclear architecture analysis machine learning of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
of prostate cancer via convolutional neural networks. IEEE and T2-weighted (T2W) radiomic features in PI-RADS
Access, 5: 18526–18533. version 2.1 category 3 lesions to predict prostate cancer
diagnosis. Abdom Radiol (NY), 46: 5647–5658.
73. Han W, Johnson C, Warner A, et al., 2020, Automatic
cancer detection on digital histopathology images of mid- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03235-0
gland radical prostatectomy specimens. J Med Imaging 80. Corbet S, Dowling M, Gao X, et al., 2019, An analysis of the
(Bellingham), 7: 047501.
intellectual structure of research on the financial economics
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.4.047501 of precious metals. Resour Policy, 63: 101416.

Volume 1 Issue 1 (2024) 15 https://doi.org/10.36922/aih.1958