Page 19 - AIH-1-1

Artificial Intelligence in Health AI in prostate cancer detection

23. Adam A, Ras R, Bhattu AS, et al., 2017, “Researching the https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26243
Research” in prostate cancer: A comparative bibliometric 35. Bonekamp D, Kohl S, Wiesenfarth M, et al., 2018, Radiomic
analysis of the top 100 cited articles in the field of prostate machine learning for characterization of prostate lesions with
cancer. Curr Urol, 11: 26–35.
MRI: Comparison to ADC values. Radiology, 289: 128–137.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000447191 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018173064
24. Tang X, Li F, Yang Y, et al., 2020, The 100 most cited articles 36. Nir G, Hor S, Karimi D, et al., 2018, Automatic grading of
in prostate cancer brachytherapy: Systematic review and prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning
bibliometric analysis. J Contemp Brachytherapy, 12: 283–289. from multiple experts. Med Image Anal, 50: 167–180.
https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.96872 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.09.005
25. Ma C, Su H, Li H, 2021, Global research trends on prostate 37. Gorelick L, Veksler O, Gaed M, et al., 2013, Prostate
diseases and erectile dysfunction: A bibliometric and histopathology: Learning tissue component histograms for
visualized study. Front Oncol, 10: 627891. cancer detection and classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.627891 32: 1804–1818.
26. Takeshima Y, Suzuki M, Miyakawa J, et al., 2021, Latent prostate 38. Monaco JP, Tomaszewski JE, Feldman MD, et al., 2010,
cancer among Japanese males: A bibliometric study of autopsy High-throughput detection of prostate cancer in histological
reports from 1980–2016. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 51: 156–159. sections using probabilistic pairwise Markov models. Med
Image Anal, 14: 617–629.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaa161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2010.04.007
27. Mushtaq R, Loan FA, 2021, Prostate cancer research:
A bibliometric study of India and Iran. Library Philos Pract, 39. Ginsburg SB, Algohary A, Pahwa S, et al., 2017, Radiomic
2021: 1–11. features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between
the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings
28. Aria M, Cuccurullo C, 2017, Bibliometrix: An R-tool for from a multi‐institutional study. J Magn Reson Imaging,
comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr, 46: 184–193.
11: 959–975.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25562
29. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L, 2010, Software survey: VOSviewer, a
computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 40. Antonelli M, Johnston EW, Dikaios N, et al., 2019, Machine
84: 523–538. learning classifiers can predict Gleason pattern 4 prostate
cancer with greater accuracy than experienced radiologists.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 Eur Radiol, 29: 4754–4764.
30. Litjens G, Debats O, Barentsz J, et al., 2014, Computer- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06244-2
aided detection of prostate cancer in MRI. IEEE Trans Med
Imaging, 33: 1083–1092. 41. Nir G, Karimi D, Goldenberg SL, et al., 2019, Comparison
of artificial intelligence techniques to evaluate performance
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2303821 of a classifier for automatic grading of prostate cancer from
31. Wang J, Wu CJ, Bao ML, et al., 2017, Machine learning- digitized histopathologic images. JAMA Netw Open, 2:
based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the e190442.
diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0442
prostate cancer. Eur Radiol, 27: 4082–4090.
42. Wang Z, Liu C, Cheng D, et al., 2018, Automated detection
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4800-5 of clinically significant prostate cancer in mp-MRI images
32. Tabesh A, Teverovskiy M, Pang HY, et al., 2007, Multi- based on an end-to-end deep neural network. IEEE Trans
feature prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading of Med Imaging, 37: 1127–1139.
histological images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 26: 1366–1378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2789181
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2007.898536 43. Gertych A, Ing N, Ma Z, et al., 2015, Machine learning
33. Strom P, Kartasalo K, Olsson H, 2020, Artificial intelligence approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from
for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: radical prostatectomies. Comput Med Imaging Graph,
A population-based, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol, 46: 197–208.
21: 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.08.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30738-7 44. Tiwari P, Kurhanewicz J, Madabhushi A, 2013, Multi-kernel
graph embedding for detection, Gleason grading of prostate
34. Chen T, Li M, Gu Y, et al., 2019, Prostate cancer differentiation
and aggressiveness: Assessment with a radiomic‐based cancer via MRI/MRS. Med Image Anal, 17: 219–235.
model vs. PI‐RADS v2. J Magn Reson Imaging, 49: 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2012.10.004

Volume 1 Issue 1 (2024) 13 https://doi.org/10.36922/aih.1958