Page 50 - AIH-1-2
P. 50
Artificial Intelligence in Health Blockchain for health-care security
improving the existing mechanism is to develop a hybrid Author contributions
mechanism system of POW and POS. Further research and
experiments on creating better consensus mechanisms will Conceptualization: Asmaul Hosna, Nujhat Tabassum
significantly contribute to the development of blockchain Rahman, Supriya Dewanjee
systems. 63 Writing – original draft: Asmaul Hosna, Nujhat Tabassum
Rahman, Supriya Dewanjee, Zulfikar Alom
10.4. Data validation and cleanup Writing – review & editing: Elmustafa Sayed Ali,
Not all data stored in the blockchain is verified, thereby Mohammad Abdul Azim, Rashid A. Saeed
prompting smart contracts to delete some codes, although Ethics approval and consent to participate
the contract address will not be removed. Furthermore,
smart contracts either have the same codes or no codes at Not applicable.
all. 59,64 In addition, most smart contracts are not published
after their execution. Therefore, data cleaning and Consent for publication
disclosure strategies must be put in place to enhance the Not applicable.
efficiency of blockchain systems.
Availability of data
10.5. Future regulations
Data are available from the corresponding author upon
In the context of applying blockchain technology in health- reasonable request.
care domain while safeguarding data security, more efforts
should be invested in navigating and resolving the issues References
in the ever-changing regulatory framework. Blockchain
technologies that are adherent to the current laws and 1. Ahmad RW, Salah K, Jayaraman R, Yaqoob I, Ellahham S,
regulations, including Health Insurance Portability and Omar M. Blockchain and COVID-19 pandemic: Applications
and challenges. Cluster Comput. 2023;26:2383-2408.
Accountability Act (HIPAA) and General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR) requirements, should be explored. To doi: 10.1007/s10586-023-04009-7
60
ensure compliance of these innovations with jurisdiction- 2. Ratwani R. Electronic health records and improved patient
specific legislations, considerations should also be given to care: Opportunities for applied psychology. Curr Dir Psychol
the legal recognition and enforcement of smart contracts Sci. 2017;26(4):359-365.
in health-care agreements. 65
doi: 10.1177/0963721417700691
11. Conclusion 3. Al Mamun A, Jahangir MUF, Azam S, Kaiser MS, Karim A.
A Combined Framework of Interplanetary File System and
The integration of blockchain technology will continue Blockchain to Securely Manage Electronic Medical Records.
to promote multifaceted advancements in the health- In: Proceedings of International Conference on Trends in
care industry. By comparing the algorithms utilized in Computational and Cognitive Engineering; 2021.
blockchain technology, we found that the POW algorithm
outperforms the rest. At present, several blockchain- doi: 10.1007/978-981-33-4673-4_40
driven platforms are already in use to store patients’ 4. Alqaralleh BA, Vaiyapuri T, Parvathy VS, Gupta D, Khanna A,
medical records. These data can then be shared with Shankar K. Blockchain-assisted secure image transmission
medical professionals for patient-centered care and overall and diagnosis model on Internet of Medical Things
improvement of treatments. Patients can store their data Environment. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2024;28:17-27.
and have full authority over who can access their data. doi: 10.1007/s00779-021-01543-2
However, there are still many flaws and challenges inherent
in this technology that needs to be addressed. 5. Attaran M. Blockchain technology in healthcare: Challenges
and opportunities. Int J Healthc Manage. 2022;15(1):70-83.
Acknowledgments doi: 10.1080/20479700.2020.1843887
None. 6. Abernethy A, Adams L, Barrett M, et al. The promise of
digital health: Then, now, and the future. NAM Perspect.
Funding 2022;2022:1-24.
None. doi: 10.31478/202206e
Conflict of interest 7. Brunese L, Mercaldo F, Reginelli A, Santone A. A blockchain
based proposal for protecting healthcare systems through
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. formal methods. Procedia Comput Sci. 2019;159:1787-1794.
Volume 1 Issue 2 (2024) 44 doi: 10.36922/aih.2580

