Page 20 - AIH-2-2
P. 20

Artificial Intelligence in Health                                          Machine learning in arthroplasty




            Table 1. (Continued)
            Author        Study population/  Performance (AUROC,   Input       Function         Model type
                          Training model size  accuracy, sensitivity/
                                         specificity, etc.)
             Huber et al. 28  30,524     THA VAS AUROC: 0.87 Demographic, medical,   Ability to predict   Extreme gradient boosting,
                                         THA Oxford AUROC:   and outcome scores  PROMs from patient   multi-step adaptive
                                         0.78                             characteristics  elastic-net, RF, neural
                                                                                          network, Naïve Bayes,
                                                                                          k-Nearest Neighbors
             Klemt et al. 7    4,526     AUROC: >83      Demographic, surgical   Ability to predict   ANN, SVM, RF, and
                                                         variables, outcome scores PROMs from patient   elastic-net penalized logistic
                                                                          characteristics  regression
            Cost/LOS
             Ramkumar         122,334    AUROC: 0.87 for LOS  Demographic and   Predicts LOS and   Naive Bayesian model
             et al. 30                   AUROC: 0.71 for   medical variables  payment
                                         payment
             Ramkumar         78,335     AUROC: 0.82 for LOS  Demographic and   Predicts LOS, inpatient  Naive Bayesian model
             et al. 31                   AUROC: 0.83 for   medical variables  charges, and discharge
                                         Charges                          disposition
                                         AUROC: 0.79 for
                                         Disposition
            Complications
             Magnéli et al. 32  1,998    AE within 30 days  Demographic, medical  Predict adverse events RF, SVM, neural network
                                         Sensitivity: 23%
                                         Specificity: 90%
                                         AEs within 90 days
                                         Sensitivity: 31%
                                         Specificity: 89%
             Shah et al. 33   89,986     AUROC: 0.732    Demographic, clinical  Predict major   Bayesian optimization
                                                                          complications   algorithm
                                                                          (e.g., infection, venous
                                                                          thromboembolism,
                                                                          cardiac complication,
                                                                          pulmonary
                                                                          complication)
             Harris et al. 34  107,792   Renal complication   Demographic, medical  Predict death and   LASSO
                                         AUROC: 0.78                      heart complications
                                         Cardiac complication
                                         AUROC: 0.73
                                         Death AUROC: 0.73
             Karhade et al. 36  5,507    AUROC: 0.77     Demographic, medical,   Predict post-operative  Elastic net-penalized logistic
                                                         opioid usage     opioid usage in   regression, stochastic
                                                                          patients undergoing   gradient boosting, RF, SVM,
                                                                          THA             neural network
             Loppini et al. 37  630      AUROC: 0.99     Radiographic imaging  Identify prosthetic   CNN
                                         Accuracy: 0.97                   loosening
                                         Sensitivity: 0.97
                                         Specificity: 0.97
             Shah et al. 38    697       Accuracy: 88.3%  Radiographic imaging  Identify prosthetic   CNN
                                         Sensitivity: 70.2%               loosening
                                         Specificity: 95.6%
            Abbreviations: AE: Adverse events; ANN: Artificial neural network; AUROC: Area under the receiving operating characteristic curve; BMD: Bone
            mineral density; CNN: Convolutional neural network; DCNN: Deep convolutional neural network; DXA: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry;
            HOOS JR: Hip and Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for joint replacement; LASSO: Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator;
            LOS: Length of stay; MCS: Mental component scores; PCS: Physical component scores; PROMS: Patient-reported outcome measures; RF: Random
            forest; SMV: Support vector machine; THA: Total hip arthroplasties; VAS: Visual Analog Scale; VGG: Visual geometry group.



            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         14                               doi: 10.36922/aih.3278
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25