Page 51 - AIH-2-2
P. 51
Artificial Intelligence in Health Health workforces’ algorithmic literacy
to operationalize it within their own contexts, the need References
for resources, both financial and human, to manage the 1. O’Hara I. Automated epistemology: Bots, computational
implementation of such an initiative in academic contexts propaganda and information literacy instruction. J Acad
is a must. There lies the main limitation that can only be Libr. 2022;48(4):102540.
addressed by senior leadership within organizations.
doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102540
5. Conclusion 2. Cotter K, Reisdorf BC. Algorithmic knowledge gaps:
The path for incorporating ALF for global health workforce A new dimension of (digital) inequality. Int J Commun.
education is about organizational and individual readiness. 2020;14:745-765.
This paper expands our earlier global work on utilizing 3. Head AJ, Fister B, MacMillan, M. Information Literacy in
CoP among global health/public health communities and the Age of Algorithms. Project Information Literacy; 2020.
those working in AI arenas, as a way of managing change Available from: https://projectinfolit.org/pubs/algorithm-
within organizations. AI algorithms are progressively study/pil_algorithm-study_2020-01-15.pdf [Last accessed
on 2024 Oct 31].
transforming the human experience, especially our
interactions in businesses, governmental affairs, education, 4. Ng FYC, Thirunavukarasu AJ, Cheng H, et al. Artificial
and entertainment. As a result, people are and will continue intelligence education: An evidence-based medicine
to see the outside world, in a sense, through the lens of approach for consumers, translators, and developers. Cell
AI algorithms. Yet, formal health workforce education is Rep Med. 2023;4(10):101230.
sluggish at adapting to changes, thus taking a slow pace doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101230
to enable its stakeholders ready for the new algorithmic 5. Frehywot S, Vovides Y. An equitable and sustainable
future. One of the largest barriers to readiness and community of practice framework to address the use of
innovation is the lack of collaboration across disciplinary artificial intelligence for global health workforce training.
silos. ALF offers universities and health workforce Hum Resour Health. 2023;21(1):45.
training institutions a way of organizing their approach doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00833-5
to algorithmic/AI literacy readiness that embraces their
organization’s values and, at the same time, urging them 6. DeVito MA. Adaptive Folk Theorization as a Path to
Algorithmic Literacy on Changing Platforms. In: Proceedings
to act. of the ACM Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Acknowledgments Vol. 5, CSCW2; 2021.
doi: 10.1145/3476080
None.
7. Ng DTK, Leung JKL, Chu SKW, Qiao MS. Conceptualizing
Funding AI literacy: An exploratory review. Comput Educ Artif Intell.
2021;2:100041.
None.
doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Conflict of interest 8. Rusanen AM. Smart Tomorrow-How Artificial Intelligence
The authors declare they have no competing interests. and Digitalization are Changing the World. Gaudeamus;
2021. Available from: https://kauppa.gaudeamus.fi/
Author contributions sivu/tuote/alykas-huominen/3841071 [Last accessed on
2024 Oct 31].
Conceptualization: All authors 9. Rainie L, Anderson J. Code-dependent: Pros and Cons of the
Writing – original draft: All authors Algorithm Age. Pew Research Center; 2017. Available from:
Writing – review & editing: All authors http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/02/08/code-dependent-
pros-and-cons-of-the-algorithm-age [Last accessed on
Ethics approval and consent to participate 2024 Oct 31].
Not applicable. 10. Oeldorf-Hirsch A, Neubaum G. What do we know about
algorithmic literacy? The status quo and a research agenda
Consent for publication for a growing field. New Media Soc. 2023.
Not applicable. doi: 10.1177/14614448231182662
Availability of data 11. McKinsey and Company. What is Generative AI? McKinsey
and Company; 2023. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.
Not applicable. com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-
Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025) 45 doi: 10.36922/aih.4903

