Page 67 - AIH-2-2
P. 67

Artificial Intelligence in Health                         Improved liver tumor segmentation with dense networks



            segmentation from computed tomography (CT) scans is   of this framework, cascaded FCNs have become a
            vital for examining, diagnosing, and treating liver cancer.   common choice in FCN-based work for liver tumor
            However, the manual delineation of liver lesions is generally   segmentation in recent years. One well-known method is
            prone to high inter-rater variability as it depends on the   the Cascaded UNets.  It combines two UNets to perform
                                                                                16
            experience and knowledge of radiologists and oncologists.    segmentation, building on the empirical success of UNet
                                                                                                            17
                                                         2,3
            In addition, the slice-by-slice annotation pipeline from CT   in medical image segmentation.  To address the limited
                                                                                         18
            volumes is time-consuming and tedious.  Therefore, the   representation power of UNet for this task, cascaded
                                             4-6
            development of an automated segmentation system for   ResNets  employ two deep residual networks  to extract
                                                                                                    20
                                                                     19
            liver tumors is essential for clinical practice.   more discriminative features. However, the quality of the
                                                               liver segmentation obtained in the first stage may affect the
              However, constructing such a system presents                                                  21
            significant challenges for two main reasons. First, the   subsequent segmentation of tumors in the second stage,
                                                               potentially leading to performance degradation.
            shape, size, location, and number of liver lesions exhibit
            substantial inter-patient variability.  Second, variations in   To mitigate this drawback, a three-stage cascaded
                                        7
            CT imaging equipment, acquisition protocols, contrast   hierarchical  convolutional-deconvolutional  neural
                                                                               21
            agents, and scanner resolutions result in unpredictable   network (HCDNN)  introduces an additional stage to
            intensity differences  between normal liver  tissues  and   refine liver region segmentation. It is worth mentioning
            tumors,  leading to blurry boundaries, noise, and other   that the aforementioned cascaded FCNs-based methods
                  8,9
            artifacts in CT images.                            are typically optimized by training FCNs sequentially.
                                                                                                            22
                                                               To further simplify the training phase, Vorontsov et al.
              To address this important yet challenging problem,
            significant efforts have been made and they can be broadly   attempted to train the cascaded FCNs-based network in an
                                                               end-to-end manner.
            classified into two categories: hand-crafted feature-based
            methods and deep learning-based methods. The former   Other methods solve this problem from the perspective
                                                                                                   23
            primarily employs conventional segmentation technologies   of data dimensions. For instance, Hu  et al.  generated
            such as intensity thresholding, level set, and region-growing   synthetic tumors in CT scans to reduce the annotating
            methods. As a simple yet effective algorithm, thresholding    computation and enrich small tumor representation.
                                                         10
                                                                       24
            intends to classify the foreground and background through   Liu et  al.  proposed a multimodal masked autoencoder
            a threshold value. To optimize the threshold selection,   for  brain  tumor  segmentation  to  alleviate  the  missing
            many  promising  technologies  have  been  proposed,   modalities in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data,
            such as histogram analysis  and between-class variance   where both random modalities and patches of the remaining
                                  11
            maximization.  The level set methods are another set of   modalities are masked for a reconstruction task. Moreover,
                       12
            classical segmentation algorithms. For example, Smeets   the strong performance of large-scale pre-trained models
            et al.  presented a semi-automatic method to adjust the   in downstream tasks has spurred efforts to apply such
                13
            initial segmentation using a speed function derived from a   models in tackling medical segmentation problems. Liu
                                                                   25
                                                 14
            pixel classification algorithm, and Hoogi et al.  proposed   et  al.  proposed a universal model incorporating text
            a novel method to improve level set segmentation through   embeddings learned from the contrastive language-image
                                                                                            26
            adaptive re-estimation of the local window. Similarly, the   pre-training model by Radford et al.,  thus enhancing the
            region-growing algorithm has attracted attention in the   domain adaptability across diverse tumor types.
            area of liver lesion segmentation, as exemplified by a 3D   Despite  promising  results  obtained  by  the
            seeded region-growing algorithm  that modeled liver   aforementioned methods, their performance could likely
                                        15
            tumors using a bag of Gaussians. In addition, numerous   be further boosted by addressing challenges related to
            machine learning methods leveraging hand-crafted   multiscale tumor segmentation and boundary refinement.
            features have been developed to segment liver tumors.   Cascaded ResNets  has provided a feasible strategy to
                                                                              19
            However, given the superiority of a fully convolutional   efficiently segment multiscale tumors. Specifically, the input
            network (FCN) in medical image segmentation compared   image is resized to various scales and the corresponding
            to hand-crafted features, this study focuses on deep-  multiscale outputs are averaged to produce the final
            learning-based methods.                            segmentation map during the testing phase. However, this
              The framework of cascaded FCNs integrates two FCNs   straightforward approach incurs high computational cost
            for a combined segmentation of the liver and its associated   and memory consumption.
            tumors; the first FCN identifies the liver region from CT   To account for multiscale tumors and further refine
            images, whereas the second one segments tumors within   tumor boundaries while circumventing those drawbacks,
            the identified region. Benefiting from the effectiveness   we present an automatic end-to-end framework for liver


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         61                               doi: 10.36922/aih.5001
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72