Page 149 - AIH-2-4
P. 149

Artificial Intelligence in Health                                 AI-driven personalized learning in residency
























                                    Figure 2. Control chart for time spent on the AI-powered learning platform
                               Abbreviations: AI: Artificial intelligence; LCL: Lower control limit; UCL: Upper control limit.




















                   Figure 3. Total duration per resident on the AI-powered learning platform, expressed as mean and SEM, with the outliers removed
                                     Abbreviations: AI: Artificial intelligence; SEM: Standard error of the mean.

            governance around content curation is essential for scaling   While this study provides valuable insights into
            these tools responsibly. 21                        AI-enhanced medical education, several limitations
              In the present study, we posit that the ICE played a   must be acknowledged. First, the educational research
            critical role in upholding ethical standards, mitigating   study was conducted within a single internal medicine
            misinformation, and ensuring the pedagogical validity   residency program, without a comparison or control
            of AI-generated educational content. By integrating   group, potentially limiting the generalizability of findings
            automated safeguards such as source verification, toxicity   across  different  specialties  and  training  environments.
            filtering, and bias mitigation, ICE directly addresses   Second, although engagement and quiz performance were
            concerns raised in prior literature regarding the reliability   strongly correlated, long-term educational outcomes, such
            of AI-driven instructional material. 22,23  This technological   as board examination performance or clinical decision-
            advancement represents an ethically sound, meaningful   making improvements, were not assessed. In addition,
            evolution over earlier AI-enhanced learning systems   resident perceptions of AI-based learning were collected
            by combining adaptive personalization with structured   through surveys. However, the  study did not include
            content  governance.  In  addition,  early AI  technologies   qualitative interviews or focus group discussions, which
            such as Verbot™ demonstrated the potential for digital   could have provided more profound insights into learner’s
            agents to enhance classroom  engagement and delivery.    experiences  and preferences.  Recent  studies  have shown
                                                         24
            As such, the platform supports individualized learning   that generative AI tools can support learner’s motivation
            trajectories and reinforces the academic integrity necessary   and improve knowledge retention in higher education
            for implementation in medical education. 25        contexts.   Future  research  should  explore  multi-
                                                                      26

            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2025)                        143                          doi: 10.36922/AIH025130023
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154