Page 29 - AIH-2-4
P. 29

Artificial Intelligence in Health                                  Early Parkinson’s detection through CNNs



            It can also help develop treatments and identify patients   using partial least squares followed by classification into
            eligible for therapeutic clinical trials. 5        controls and Parkinsonism by means of a support vector
                                                                                              29
              Single photon emission computed tomography       machine (SVM) classifier. Illan  et al.  also used voxels
            (SPECT) imaging using   123 I-Ioflupane (DaTSCAN or   corresponding to the striatum to train an SVM classifier
            [123I]FP-CIT) has been shown to increase the diagnostic   with  a  linear  kernel  to  classify  controls  and  PS.  Rojas
                                                                   30
            accuracy of PD, mainly in the earlier stages of the disease,   et al.  used voxels corresponding to the striatum and then
                                                               carried out feature reduction through principal component
            by showing the functional deterioration or dopaminergic   analysis followed by classification using SVM. Towey
            deficit in the striatal region of the brain (which is one of   31
            the primary regions affected in PD).  The accuracy of   et al.  performed feature extraction on all voxels through
                                           6-9
            diagnosis of PD at an early phase is the poorest based on   singular  value  decomposition  followed  by  classification
                                                                                                   32
            clinical indices as early symptoms are mild/moderate,   into PS or non-PS. Huertas-Fernández et al.  calculated
            unlike in advanced stages of the disease.  Furthermore,   the bilateral caudate and putamen uptake and asymmetry
                                             4,5
            these symptoms are common in other neurodegenerative   indices  from  SPECT images and  developed  predictive
            disorders like essential tremor and multiple system   models using logistic regression, SVM, and LDA to classify
                                                               PD from vascular Parkinsonism. Kim et al.  used image
                                                                                                  20
            atrophy, which often leads to misdiagnosis. 10-12  The effects   augmentation to increase the size of data and a classifier
            of misdiagnosis are severe as it may lead to unnecessary   based on the Inception v3 model that can classify normal
            medical examinations and therapies, and associated side-  from abnormal SPECT scans.
            effects. Recent studies have shown that around 3.6 – 19.6%
            of clinically diagnosed PD subjects show no dopaminergic   There are also many studies using the SPECT data from
            deficit, and these subjects are classified as scans   the Parkinson’s progression marker initiative (PPMI),
            without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD). 10-  which is among the most popular, widely used, and largest
            12   Subsequent  follow-up  on  these  subjects  have  shown   database for PD, 11,19,21-27,33,34,45-48  and the same data were used
                                                                                         11
            that they neither deteriorate nor respond to levodopa (a   in the present study. Choi et al.  trained a convolutional
            primary medication in PD) and that their SPECT scans   neural network (CNN), which they called PD net, using
            remain normal in the follow-up imaging. Thus, these   SPECT images to classify PD from normal and non-
            subjects were considered highly unlikely of having PD and   Parkinsonism tremor. They also used the model to classify
            that the initial diagnosis of PD was incorrect. 13-15  These   SWEDD subjects. In their analysis, they used the complete
            studies evidently point out that dopaminergic imaging is   volume data, rather than considering a selected range of
            highly useful and that an abnormal imaging, at least in   slices, due to which the CNN network became complex
            cases of diagnostic uncertainty, is strongly supportive of a   with many layers. Martínez-Murcia  et  al.  also used a
                                                                                                  22
            diagnosis  of  neurodegenerative  Parkinsonism  (PS),  such   CNN to differentiate PD from others (healthy normal
            as PD.                                             and SWEDD). They used a threshold-based approach to
                                                               select sub-volumes from the volume which they later input
              In clinical practice, SPECT images are usually analyzed
            by visual inspection and/or by region of interest (ROI)   to the CNN. They observed that due to this sub-volume
                                                               selection, the complexity of the CNN became small with
                  16
            analysis.  The visual analysis relies on the judgment of the   just two convolutional layers. Martínez-Murcia  et al.
                                                                                                            21
                                                                                        22 
            observer that heavily depends on his expertise, experience,   used the features extracted from SPECT images through
            and knowledge.  ROI techniques involve outlining or   independent component analysis to train an SVM classifier
                         17
            positioning the ROI over the striatum (target region) and   to distinguish PD from normal. They observed much better
            the occipital cortex (reference region), and a quantitative   performance than their previous work using the voxel-
            measure termed the background subtracted striatal uptake   as-features  approach.  Hirschauer  et al.   used  data  from
                                                                                               19
            ratio  is computed.   Despite the odds,  the latter method   different clinical examinations and SPECT imaging, and
                           6
            or the quantitative method is the most acceptable one,   trained an enhanced probabilistic neural network model
            since, according to a trial study, it provides an excellent   to differentiate PD from SWEDD. Oliveira and Castelo-
            intra- and inter-observer agreement.  However, the ROI-  Branco  used voxels as features that were extracted based
                                         18
                                                                     23
            based approach relies on manual intervention for placing   on volumes of interest defined (which required manual
            the ROIs.                                          intervention), and an SVM classifier was used to classify
              There  have  been  many studies that make use  of   PD from normal. The standard binding potential features
            machine learning techniques to develop predictive models   along with other features related to the volume and length
            from SPECT imaging features for the early detection of   of the striatal region from SPECT images was utilized to
            PD. 11,19-31  Segovia  et al.  extracted voxels corresponding   train an SVM classifier that could classify PD from healthy
                               28
            to the striatum and performed data decomposition   normal.  Ortiz et al.  extracted features from isosurfaces
                                                                                24
                                                                     33
            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2025)                         23                          doi: 10.36922/AIH025040005
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34