Page 31 - AIH-2-4
P. 31

Artificial Intelligence in Health                                  Early Parkinson’s detection through CNNs




            Table 1. Details of the subjects in terms of age, gender, and the HY stage
            Gender           Normal                       Early PD                         SWEDD
                       Count     Age (mean)   Count     Age (mean)   HY stage   Count     Age (mean)  HY stage
            Female      73         59.32        157       60.91      1.46±0.50    30        58.16     1.4±0.50
            Male        136        61.65        286       62.13      1.53±0.50    50        61.80     1.5±0.54
            All         209        60.79        443        61.7      1.51±0.50    80        60.43     1.46±0.53
            Note: HY stands for Hoehn and Yahr stage.
            Abbreviations: PD: Parkinson’s disease; SWEDD: Scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit.

























                                                  Figure 1. Flowchart of the analysis
                              Abbreviations: PPMI: Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative; SVM: Support vector machine.

            means each scan is of 3D type with size 91 × 109 × 91.   2.4. Image normalization
            In published literature,  the areas of striatal activity from   The intensities in the original SPECT image ranged from 0
                              27
            SPECT images were analyzed and it was observed that the   to 2 -1. To standardize the data, the selected images (both
                                                                  15
            most relevant striatal activity came from slices 35 to 48,   single slice as well as the mean image) were normalized by
            with the highest activity occurring in slice number 41.  dividing the intensity values by 2 -1, so that the normalized
                                                                                        15
            In this work, two types of images were used for the analysis.  intensity is in the range [0 – 1].
            •   Single slice: It is the 41  slice extracted from the SPECT   2.5. Data partitioning
                                 st
               volume,  as this is  the  slice  with  maximum  striatal
               uptake, making it very relevant for PD detection.  Data were divided into two parts, namely, Partition 1 and
            •   Mean image: It is the average of slices from 35 to 48   Partition 2, in the ratio of about 80:20. Partition 1 was used
               extracted from the SPECT volume as these are the   for model training and evaluation using an approach based
               slices that show striatal activity.             on cross-validation (10-fold). That is, Partition 1 data were
                                                               split into 10 folds and then one of the folds became the
              Figure 2 shows both the single slice and mean image for   evaluation set, and the remaining nine folds were used
            the three groups: Normal control, early PD, and SWEDD.   for training the model, with the whole process repeated
            Normal scans are characterized by intense, uniform, and   nine times such that every fold became a test set and the
            symmetric high-intensity regions (corresponding to the   remaining nine folds became the training data. Partition
            caudate and striatum) on both hemispheres that appear   2 was exclusively used for hyperparameter tuning of the
            as two comma-shaped regions, as evident in  Figure  2A   machine learning methods and was not involved in model
            and  2C. In PD, dopaminergic neuron deterioration   training or evaluation. All reported performance measures
            leads to a reduction in the comma-shaped region, which   were solely based on the cross-validation output from
            becomes smaller and more circular in shape, as observed   Partition 1 data. An illustration of the data partitioning is
            in Figure 2B.                                      shown in Figure 3.


            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2025)                         25                          doi: 10.36922/AIH025040005
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36