Page 114 - AJWEP-22-5

Liu and Jusoh

3.2. Are there plans to introduce or promote new technologies or models to enhance the reuse of
construction waste?
(i) What are these technologies?
(ii) How do they differ from previous ones?
(iii) What are their advancements?
(iv) How effective are they?
(v) Are they suitable for current conditions?

Appendix B. Interview outcomes summary

Table A1. The economic benefits of the construction waste management from different perspectives
Code Economic Manifestation Cost composition Control measures Improvement Desired
benefit directions support units
C1 Yes Reduced Waste collection, Cost control during the Introduce Government
raw material sorting, and budgeting phase and automated sorting departments,
purchase costs transportation regularly evaluating equipment recycling unit
and waste the utilization rate of and optimize
disposal fees recycled materials transportation
routes
C2 Yes Lower waste Labor costs, Set up dedicated waste Enhance Government
disposal costs machinery sorting areas on-site, professional department,
rental, and waste reducing transportation skills, especially transportation
transportation costs in the technical companies
expenses application of
waste sorting and
reuse
C3 Yes Long-term Recycling Establish long-term Develop tiered Equipment
savings on equipment, partnerships with treatment plans for suppliers
raw material transportation, equipment suppliers different types of
expenses and secondary to obtain discounted waste
processing costs prices
C4 No Initial Specialized Consider recycling and Promote Government
investment sorting equipment, processing only when industry-wide department
and labor costs transportation cost accounting meets optimization
are relatively expenses, and site the required conditions of recycling
higher, management fees technologies and
exceeding the increase financial
savings support

Volume 22 Issue 5 (2025) 108 doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025120080