Page 198 - AJWEP-22-5
P. 198

Hou, et al.

                   magnesium slag-based filling materials. Chinese J Eng.      doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.12.082
                   2023;45:1324-1334.                               31.  Lei Z, Tianqi S, Wenzhe G, et al. Experimental research on
                   doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2022.06.06.001         transport⁃resistance characteristics of gangue slurry and
                26.  Wang Z, Wang Z, Zhao W. Microscopic pore and filling   its flow trend in goaf. J China Coal Soc. 2022;47:39-48.
                   performance of coal gangue cementitious paste. J Wuhan      doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2021.1298
                   Univ Technol. 2018;33:427-430.                   32.  Liu P, Liu Z, Lu Z, Guo Y, Qiu Y. Study on preparation
                   doi: 10.1007/s11595-018-1840-9                       and influencing factors of coal gangue fill slurry material.
                27.  Zheng  BK,  Yao  W,  Huang  TL,  Zhang  LY,  Yin  XY.   Case Stud Constr Mater. 2024;21:e03986.
                   Transportable  performance  of  modified  unclassed      doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03986
                   tailings  filling  slurry  based  on  loop  test.  Chinese J   33.  Zhang X, Russell AR, Dong X. Liquefaction responses
                   Nonferr Metal. 2021;31:520-529.                      of  fibre  reinforced  sand  in  shaking  table  tests  with
                   doi: 10.11817/j.ysxb.1004.0609.2021-35941            a  laminated  shear  stack.  Soil  Dyn  Earthq  Eng.
                28.  Li  M, Yan  P,  Han  J,  Guo  L.  Which  is  an  appropriate      2022;162:107466.
                                                                        doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107466
                   quadratic rheological model of fresh paste, the modified   34.  Baldermann A, Preissegger V, Dietzel M. Solubility of
                   Bingham  model  or  the  parabolic  model?  Processes.   C-A-S-H  phases  with  high  degree  of  heavy  metal  ion
                   2022;10:2603.                                        substitution. Constr Build Mater. 2022;327:126926.
                   doi: 10.3390/pr10122603                              doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126926
                29.  Wang Y, Wang LQ, Cao C, Liu W. Characterization of   35.  Liu CL, Chen ZF, Zhu Y, Yu JG. Fundamental study of
                   filling  slurry  yield  stress  based  on  a  mini-slump  cone   leaching kinetics and mechanism of spodumene assisted
                   test. Chinese J Eng. 2023;45:1316-1323.              by mechanical activation. Miner Eng. 2024;218:108936.
                   doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2022.11.04.003         doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2024.108936
                30.  Xiao J, Wang S, Ye S, Wang J, Wen J, Tu J. Experimental   36.  Golik  VI,  Klyuev  RV,  Martyushev  NV,  Zyukin  DA,
                   investigation  on  pre-heating  technology  of  coal  water   Karlina AI. Technology for nonwaste recovery of tailings
                   slurry with different concentration in shell-and-tube heat   of the mizur mining and processing plant. Metallurgist.
                   exchangers with ladder-type fold baffles. Int J Heat Mass   2023;66:1476–1480.
                   Tran. 2019;132:1116-1125.                            doi: 10.1007/s11015-023-01462-y













































                Volume 22 Issue 5 (2025)                       192                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025200154
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203