Page 146 - AJWEP-22-6

Aleid, et al.

References 2018;6(4):40-43.
13. Abbas M, Trari M. Removal of amoxicillin from
1. Bódalo-Santoyo A, Gómez-Carrasco JL, Gómez- wastewater onto activated carbon: Optimization of
Gómez E, Máximo-Martín F, Hidalgo-Montesinos AM. analytical parameters by response surface methodology.
Application of reverse osmosis to reduce pollutants Dose Response. 2024;22:15593258241271655.
present in industrial wastewater. Desalination. doi: 10.1177/15593258241271655
2003;155:101-108. 14. Spit T, Van der Hoek JP, De Jong C, Van Halem D,
doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00287-x De Kreuk M, Perez BB. Removal of antibiotic resistance
2. Jarusutthirak C, Amy G, Croué JP. Fouling characteristics from municipal secondary effluents by ozone-activated
of wastewater effluent organic matter isolates on NF and carbon filtration. Front Environ Sci. 2022;10:834577.
UF membranes. Desalination. 2002;145:247-255. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.834577
doi: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00419-8 15. Mullai P, Rajesh V. Post treatment of antibiotic
3. Tong WY, Fu XY, Lee SM, et al. Purification of L-(+) wastewater by adsorption on activated carbon. AIP Conf
lactic acid from fermentation broth with paper sludge Proc. 2018;1927:020002.
as a cellulosic feedstock using weak anion exchanger doi: 10.1063/1.5021190
Amberlite IRA-92. Biochem Eng J. 2004;18:89-96. 16. Zhanga J, Lidietta Giornob L, Driolib E. Study of a hybrid
doi: 10.1016/S1369-703X(03)00170-0 process combining PAC and membrane operations
s
4. Yousuf A, Bonk F, Oyanedel JRB, Schmidt JE. Recovery for antibiotic wastewater treatment. Desalination.
of carboxylic acids produced during dark fermentation 2006;194:101-107.
of food waste by adsorption on amberlite IRA-67 and doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.11.004
activated carbon. Bioresour Technol. 2016;217:137-140. 17. EPA. Reduction in Mean Biochemical Oxygen Demand
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.035 [BOD5] Due to Tree Cover. EnviroAtlas: Led by the
5. Antonio GR, Vaccari G, Dosi E, Trilli A, Rossi M, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2014. p. 1-2.
Matteuzzi D. Enhanced production of L-(+) lactic acid 18. Penn MR, Pauer JJ, Mihelcic JR. Biological oxygen
in chemostat by Lactobacillus casei DSM 20011 using demand. In: Sabjic A, editor. Environment and Ecological
ion-exchange resins and cross-flow filtration in a fully Chemistry. Encyclopedia of Life Support System. Vol. 2.
automated pilot plant controlled via NIR. Biotechnol Isle of Man, UK: UNESCO; 2009. p. 278.
Bioeng. 2000;67:147-156. 19. Aleid SM, Hamad SH, Delaunay S, Fick M,
6. Cao X, Yun HS, Koo YM. Recovery of L-(+)-lactic acid Olmos E. Pristinamycin production using Streptomyces
by anion exchange resin amberlite IRA-400. Biochem pristinaespiralis and date sirup as substrate-process
Eng J. 2002;11:189-196. modeling, optimization, and scale-up. Prep Biochem
doi: 10.1016/S1369-703X(02)00024-4 Biotechnol. 2022;52:1044-1050.
7. Gao MT, Shimamura T, Ishida N, Takahashi H. doi: 10.1080/10826068.2021.2024849
pH-uncontrolled lactic acid fermentation with activated 20. Aleid SM. Chromatographic separation of fructose from
carbon as an adsorbent. Enzyme Microb Technol. date syrup. Int J Food Sci Nut. 2006;57:83-96.
2011;48:526-530. doi: 10.1080/09637480600658286
doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.07.015 21. EPA. Chemical Oxygen Demand (Titrimetric, High Level
8. Ranaweera R, Wu X, Ng D, et al. Comparative study of for Saline Waters). Method 410.3. United States: EPS;
adsorption, thermally activated peroxymonosulfate and 1978.
wet air oxidation for tetracycline removal and wastewater 22. EPA. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and
treatment. J Water Process Eng. 2025;72:107559. Wastes. Biological Oxygen Demand (5201B) 5-day BOD
doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107559 Test. EPA/600/4-79/020. Cincinnati, Ohio, USA: EPA
9. Cheremisinoff NP, Cheremisinoff PN. Carbon Adsorption Environmental Monitoring Laboratory; 1983.
for Pollution Control [Process and Pollution Control 23. APHA, American Public Health Association. Standard
Equipment Series]; 1993 methods for the examination of water and wastewater. In:
10. Park KM, Nam HG, Lee KB, Mun S. Adsorption Greenberg AE, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Franson, MAH,
behaviors of sugars and sulfuric acid on activated porous editors. Joint Editorial Board. 20 ed. Publication Office:
th
carbon. J Ind Eng Chem. 2016;34:21-26. American Public Health Association, Washington, USA;
11. Pradhan N, Rene ER, Lens PNL, et al. Adsorption 1998.
behaviour of lactic acid on granular activated carbon and 24. Ye C, Wang X, Wang H, Wang Z. Effects of counter anions
anionic resins: Thermodynamics, isotherms and kinetic on the adsorption properties of 4-methylimidazolium-
studies. Energies. 2017;10:665. modified silica materials. J Taiwan Instit Chem Eng.
doi: 10.3390/en10050665 2014;45:2868-2877.
12. Tezcanun U, Ocal SE, Gul A. Removal of antibiotic 25. Farhadpour FA, Bono A. Sorptive separation of ethanol-
wastes by adsorption method. Int J Adv Sci Eng Technol. water mixtures with a bi-dispersed hydrophobic

Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025) 140 doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025240198