Page 174 - AJWEP-22-6

Yadav, et al.

81. Narayan S, Rai S, Behera M, Ranjan A. Dynamic assembly 92. Das CR, Das S, Panda S. Groundwater quality monitoring
and stabilization of surfactant-dye-polyelectrolyte by correlation, regression and hierarchical clustering
complexes: An overview. J Mol Liq. 2025;421:126897. analyses using WQI and PAST tools. Groundw Sustain
doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2025.126897 Dev. 2022;16:100708.
82. Yadav SN, Rai S, Sinha B, Bhattarai A. Influence doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100708
of polyelectrolyte (NaCMC) on surfactant (DTAB) 93. Alemu CM, Aycheh YF, Angualie GS, Engidayehu SS.
in the absence and presence of methyl orange dye Modeling on comprehensive evaluation of groundwater
in ethanol - water mixed solvent at three different quality status using geographic information system
temperatures. ChemistrySelect. 2024;9:202404772. (GIS) and water quality index (WQI): A case study of
doi: 10.1002/slct.202404772 Bahir Dar City, Amhara, Ethiopia. Water Pract Technol.
83. Narayan S, Rai S, Bhattarai A, Sinha B. Impact of 2024;19:1084-1098.
sodium polystyrene sulfonate on micellization behaviour doi: 10.2166/wpt.2024.076
of Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide in the presence of 94. Abolli S, Nasab MA, Yaghmaeian K, Alimohammadi M.
methyl red in ethanol - water mixture: A conductometric Determination the effects of physico-chemical
investigation. J Mol Liq. 2024;399:124387. parameters on groundwater status by water quality index
doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124387 (WQI). Desalin Water Treat. 2022;269:84-92.
84. Narayan S, Rai S, Shah P, Roy N, Bhattarai A. doi: 10.5004/dwt.2022.28755
Spectrophotometric and conductometric studies on 95. Ji Y, Wu J, Wang Y, Elumalai V, Subramani T. Seasonal
the interaction of surfactant with polyelectrolyte in the variation of drinking water quality and human health
presence of dye in aqueous medium spectrophotometric risk assessment in Hancheng City of Guanzhong Plain,
and conductometric studies on the interaction of China. Expo Health. 2020;12:469-485.
surfactant with polyelectrolyte in the presence. J Mol doi: 10.1007/s12403-020-00357-6
Liq. 2022;355:118949. 96. Khan MK, Ayoub W, Saied S, et al. Statistical
doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118949 and geospatial assessment of groundwater quality
85. Dohare D, Deshpande S, Kotiya A. Analysis of ground in the megacity of Karachi. J Water Resour Prot.
water quality parameters: A review. Res J Eng Sci. 2019;11:311-332.
2014;3:2278-9472. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2019.113018
86. Devi S, Premkumar R. Physicochemical analysis of 97. Abbasnejad B, Abbasnejad A, Derakhshani R.
groundwater samples near industrial Area, Cuddalore Groundwater evaluation of Northern Jazmourian (South
District, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J ChemTech Res. Iran) for drinking, agriculture, and associated health
2012;4:29-34. risks of nitrate and fluoride contamination. Hum Ecol
87. Mengstie YA, Desta WM, Alemayehu E. Assessment of Risk Assess. 2023;29:36-57.
drinking water quality in urban water supply systems: doi: 10.1080/10807039.2022.2140028
The case of Hawassa City, Ethiopia. Int J Anal Chem. 98. Mohan U, Singh R. Water quality assessment and
2023;2023:8880601. physicochemical parameters of groundwater in District
doi: 10.1155/2023/8880601 Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India. Environ Conserv J.
88. Susaiappan S, Somanathan A, Sulthan MT, Masilamani IP. 2013;14:143-149.
Groundwater quality variation and regression analysis 99. Picetti R, Deeney M, Pastorino S, et al. Nitrate and
a case study around municipal dumpsite in India. Rev nitrite contamination in drinking water and cancer risk:
Chim. 2021;72:133-145. A systematic review with meta-analysis. Environ Res.
doi: 10.37358/rc.21.1.8410 2022;210:112988.
89. Kothari V, Vij S, Sharma SK, Gupta N. Correlation of doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112988
various water quality parameters and water quality 100. Dahiya S, Singh B, Gaur S, Garg VK, Kushwaha HS.
index of districts of Uttarakhand. Environ Sustain Indic. Analysis of groundwater quality using fuzzy synthetic
2021;9:100093. evaluation. J Hazard Mater. 2007;147:938-946.
doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2020.100093 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.119
90. Porsan ZP, Zarei A, Alimohammadi M. Evaluation of 101. Ding F, Chen L, Sun C, Zhang W, Yue H, Na S. An
corrosion and scaling potential of drinking groundwater in upgraded groundwater quality evaluation based on
Gonbad-e Kavus. Desalin Water Treat. 2020;195:19-25. hasse diagram technique & game theory. Ecol Indic.
doi: 10.5004/dwt.2020.25895 2022;140:109024.
91. Al-Khashman OA, Jaradat AQ. Assessment of doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109024
groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and 102. Subba Rao N. Groundwater quality from a part of
agricultural uses in arid environment. Stoch Environ Res Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Appl Water
Risk Assess. 2014;28:743-753. Sci. 2018;8:1-18.
doi: 10.1007/s00477-013-0787-x doi: 10.1007/s13201-018-0665-2

Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025) 168 doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025120083