Page 175 - AJWEP-22-6
P. 175

Water quality of Bharatpur, Nepal

                103. Thakur  JK,  Diwakar  J, Singh  SK. Hydrogeochemical   2023;195:1158.
                   evaluation  of groundwater of Bhaktapur Municipality,      doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11804-7
                   Nepal. Environ Earth Sci. 2015;74:4973-4988.     114. Das CR, Das S. Assessment of surface water quality for
                   doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4514-4                       drinking by combining three water quality indices with
                104. Hanipha M, Hussain Z. Study of groundwater quality at   their usefulness: Case of Damodar River in India. Water
                   Dindigul Town, Tamilnadu, India. Int Res J Environ Sci.   Air Soil Pollut. 2023;234:327.
                   2019;2:68-73.                                        doi: 10.1007/s11270-023-06342-4
                105. Pei-Yue L, Hui Q,  Jian-Hua  W. Groundwater quality   115. Olasehinde P,  Amadi  A, Dan-Hassan M, Jimoh M.
                   assessment based on improved water  quality  index  in   Statistical  assessment of groundwater  quality  in
                   Pengyang County, Ningxia, Northwest China. E-J Chem.   Ogbomosho, Southwest Nigeria.  Am J Min Metall.
                   2010;7:209-216.                                      2015;3:21-28.
                   doi: 10.1155/2010/451304                             doi: 10.12691/ajmm-3-1-4
                106. Olaolu  TD. Pollution  indicators  and pathogenic   116. Jena  V, Sinha D. Physicochemical  analysis of ground
                   microorganisms in wastewater  treatment:  Implication   water of selected areas of Raipur City. Indian J Sci Res.
                   on receiving  water  bodies.  Int J Environ Prot Policy.   2017;13:61-65.
                   2014;2:205.                                      117. Gulgundi MS, Shetty A. Groundwater quality assessment
                   doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20140206.12                    of Urban Bengaluru using multivariate  statistical
                107. Yu F, Okamto S, Nakasone K, et al. Molecular cloning   techniques. Appl Water Sci. 2018;8:43.
                   and functional characterization of α-humulene synthase,      doi: 10.1007/s13201-018-0684-z
                   a  possible  key  enzyme  of  Zerumbone  biosynthesis  in   118. Singh EJK, Gupta A, Singh NR. Groundwater quality in
                   shampoo  ginger  (Zingiber  Zerumbet  Smith).  Planta.   Imphal West District, Manipur, India, with multivariate
                   2008;227:1291-1299.                                  statistical  analysis of data.  Environ Sci  Pollut  Res.
                   doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0700-x                       2013;20:2421-2434.
                108. Kar S. Determination of water quality index (WQI) during      doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1127-2
                   mass bathing in different Ghats of river ganga in Howrah   119. Trabelsi  R,  Zouari  K.  Coupled  geochemical  modeling
                   and North 24 Parganas District, West Bengal, India. Int J   and  multivariate  statistical  analysis  approach  for the
                   Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2017;887:1097-1104.        assessment of groundwater quality in irrigated  areas:
                   doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2017.9159                      A study from North Eastern of Tunisia. Groundw Sustain
                109. Das  Kangabam  R,  Bhoominathan  SD,  Kanagaraj  S,   Dev. 2019;8:413-427.
                   Govindaraju M. Development of a water quality index      doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2019.01.006
                   (WQI) for the Loktak Lake in India.  Appl Water Sci.   120. Singh CK, Shashtri S, Mukherjee S. Integrating
                   2017;7:2907-2918.                                    multivariate statistical analysis with GIS for geochemical
                   doi: 10.1007/s13201-017-0579-4                       assessment of groundwater quality  in Shiwaliks of
                110. Lumb A, Sharma TC, Bibeault JF. A review of genesis   Punjab, India. Environ Earth Sci. 2011;62:1387-1405.
                   and evolution of water quality index (WQI) and some      doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0625-0
                   future directions. Water Qual Expo Health. 2011;3:11-24.  121. Kim  JH,  Kim  RH,  Lee  J,  Cheong  TJ,  Yum  BW,
                   doi: 10.1007/s12403-011-0040-0                       Chang HW. Multivariate statistical analysis to identify
                111. Şener  Ş,  Şener  E,  Davraz  A.  Evaluation  of  water   the major factors governing groundwater quality in the
                   quality  using water  quality  index  (WQI) method  and   coastal area of Kimje, South  Korea.  Hydrol Process.
                   GIS  in  Aksu  River  (SW-Turkey).  Sci Total Environ.   2005;19:1261-1276.
                   2017;584-585:131-144.                                doi: 10.1002/hyp.5565
                   doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.102             122. Molekoa  MD,  Avtar  R,  Kumar  P,  Minh  HVT,
                112. Bora M, Goswami DC.  Water quality assessment      Kurniawan  TA. Hydrogeochemical  assessment of
                   in terms of water quality index (WQI): Case study    groundwater quality of Mokopane Area, Limpopo, South
                   of  the  Kolong  River,  Assam,  India.  Appl Water Sci.   Africa using statistical  approach.  Water (Switzerland).
                   2017;7:3125-3135.                                    2019;11:1891.
                   doi: 10.1007/s13201-016-0451-y                       doi: 10.3390/w11091891
                113. Das  CR,  Das  S,  Panda  S.  MLR  index-based  principal   123. Dobaradaran S, Mahvi AH, Dehdashti S, Dobaradaran  S,
                   component analysis to investigate and monitor probable   Shoara R. Correlation of fluoride with some inorganic
                   sources of groundwater pollution and quality in coastal   constituents  in groundwater  of Dashtestan,  Iran.
                   areas: A case study in East India. Environ Monit Assess.   Fluoride. 2009;42:50-53.









                Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025)                       169                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025120083
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180