Page 73 - AN-1-3
P. 73

Advanced Neurology                                 BRRS: A screening and monitoring tool for better prognosis in AD



            highly selected brain regions that are primarily impaired   Writing – original draft: Qiujie Shan and Ping-Hsuan Wei
            in AD-spectrum patients, including the hippocampus,   Writing – review & editing: Feng Bai and Yun Xu
            medial  temporal  lobe,  precuneus,  and  temporoparietal
            regions . Nevertheless, despite the fact that there are   Ethics approval and consent to participate
                  [44]
            extensive studies on respective AD risk factors, the   Not applicable.
            scarcity in comprehensive research focusing on the
            weight of the impact of each AD risk factor until recently   Consent for publication
            makes it impractical for further discussions in this review,   Not applicable.
            requiring further research to solve this in the future. In
            addition, although the BRRS can provide diagnostic   Availability of data
            and therapeutic guidance based on the patients’ clinical
            performance, individual AD development rate cannot   Not applicable.
            be evaluated in the early stage of application but only by   References
            means of accumulated data from the patients’ total scores.
            Last but not least, neuropsychological testing, which   1.   Aisen PS, Jimenez-Maggiora GA, Rafii MS,  et  al., 2022,
            we suggest to employ in conjunction with BRRS, is not   Early-stage alzheimer disease: getting trial-ready.  Nat Rev
            included due to our consideration that it has already been   Neurol, 18(7): 389–399.
            widely used in clinical staging.                      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-022-00645-6

            5. Conclusions                                     2.   Vermunt L, Sikkes SAM, van den Hout A,  et  al., 2019,
                                                                  Duration of preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages
            In this review, we propose the BRRS, a promising      of alzheimer’s disease in relation to age, sex, and APOE
            preliminary screening and monitoring tool based on AD   genotype. Alzheimers Dement, 15(7): 888–898.
            risk factors and brain alteration, which can be used in      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.04.001
            parallel with the current AD guideline, with individual   3.   Studart AN, Nitrini R, 2016, Subjective cognitive decline:
            differences  fully considered and  little  additional  burden   The first clinical manifestation of alzheimer’s disease?
            added. Due to its simplicity of use, the BRRS is accessible to   Dement Neuropsychol, 10(3): 170–177.
            clinicians in grassroots clinics and can be widely promoted.
            It has major diagnostic and therapeutic implications as      https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-5764-2016dn1003002
            it significantly contributes to realizing early and accurate   4.   Rabin  LA,  Smart  CM,  Amariglio  RE,  2017,  Subjective
            identification of AD, the tracking and prognosis of   cognitive decline in preclinical alzheimer’s disease.  Annu
            AD-spectrum patients, as well as the design of individually   Rev Clin Psychol, 13: 369–396.
            tailored treatment in a timely manner. Furthermore, we      https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045136
            strongly recommend that the weight coefficient of each   5.   Ferreira D, Pereira JB, Volpe G,  et al., 2019, Subtypes of
            item in BRRS be extensively studied in future research for   alzheimer’s disease display distinct network abnormalities
            the sake of a precise and formal application of the scale in   extending  beyond  their  pattern  of  brain  atrophy.  Front
            clinical settings as soon as possible.                Neurol, 10: 524.
            Acknowledgments                                       https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00524

            None.                                              6.   Lehmann M, Madison C, Ghosh PM, et al., 2015, Loss of
                                                                  functional connectivity is greater outside the default mode
            Funding                                               network in nonfamilial early-onset alzheimer’s disease
                                                                  variants. Neurobiol Aging, 36(10): 2678–2686.
            This work was partly supported by grants from the National      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.06.029
            Natural  Science Foundation  of China (No.  82071186;
            81822013).                                         7.   Vogel JW, Hansson O, 2022, Subtypes of alzheimer’s disease:
                                                                  questions, controversy, and meaning. Trends Neurosci, 45(5):
            Conflict of interest                                  342–345.

            The authors declare that they have no competing interests.     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2022.02.001
                                                               8.   Duara R, Barker W, 2022, Heterogeneity in alzheimer’s
            Author contributions                                  disease diagnosis and progression rates: Implications for

            Conceptualization: Ping-Hsuan Wei and Qiujie Shan     therapeutic trials. Neurotherapeutics, 19(1): 8–25.
            Supervision: Feng Bai and Yun Xu                      https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-022-01185-z


            Volume 1 Issue 3 (2022)                         8                       https://doi.org/10.36922/an.v1i3.208
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78