Page 15 - AN-2-3

Advanced Neurology Woven Endobridge embolization: Indications and innovation

24. Arthur AS, Molyneux A, Coon AL, et al., 2019, The safety Surg, 8: 927–933.
and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012035
for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms:
Final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular 34. Darflinger R, Thompson LA, Zhang Z, et al., 2016,
Therapy (WEB-IT) Study. J Neurointerv Surg, 11: 924–930. Recurrence, retreatment, and rebleed rates of coiled
aneurysms with respect to the Raymond-Roy scale: A meta-
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014815 analysis. J Neurointerv Surg, 8: 507–511.
25. Cagnazzo F, Marnat G, Ferreira I, et al., 2021, Comparison https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011668
of Woven EndoBridge device sizing with conventional
measurements and virtual simulation using the Sim&Size 35. Peterson C, Cord BJ, 2021, Recurrent and residual
software: A multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg, aneurysms after Woven EndoBridge (WEB) therapy: What’s
13: 924–929. next? Cureus, 13: e14404.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017060 https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14404
26. Spelle L, Herbreteau D, Caroff J, et al., 2022, CLinical 36. Zhang SM, Liu LX, Ren PW, et al., 2020, Effectiveness,
Assessment of WEB device in Ruptured aneurYSms safety and risk factors of Woven EndoBridge device in the
(CLARYS): 12-month angiographic results of a multicenter treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: Systematic
study. J Neurointerv Surg, Published Online First: 1–6. review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg, 136: e1–e23.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018749 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.023
27. Chalouhi N, Hoh BL, Hasan D, 2013, Review of cerebral 37. Srinivasan VM, Dmytriw AA, Regenhardt RW, et al.,
aneurysm formation, growth, and rupture. Stroke, 2022, Retreatment of residual and recurrent aneurysms
44: 3613–3622. after embolization with the woven EndoBridge device:
Multicenter case series. Neurosurgery, 90: 569–580.
https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.113.002390
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000001883
28. Linzey JR, Griauzde J, Guan Z, et al., 2017, Stent-assisted
coiling of cerebrovascular aneurysms: Experience at a large 38. Pierot L, 2021, Ten years of clinical evaluation of the woven
tertiary care center with a focus on predictors of recurrence. EndoBridge: A safe and effective treatment for wide-neck
J Neurointerv Surg, 9: 1081–1085. bifurcation aneurysms. Neurointervention, 16: 211–221.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012704 https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2021.00395
29. Ries T, Siemonsen S, Thomalla G, et al., 2007, Long- 39. McPheeters MJ, Vakharia K, Munich SA, et al., 2019, Wide-
term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular necked cerebral artery aneurysms: Where do we stand?
therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Endovascular Today, 18: 70–79.
Neuroradiol, 28: 1755–1761. 40. Wallner AK, Broussalis E, Hauser T, et al., 2012, Coiling after
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0649 treatment with the woven EndoBridge cerebral aneurysm
embolization device. A case report. Interv Neuroradiol,
30. Kabbasch C, Goertz L, Siebert E, et al., 2019, WEB 18: 208–212.
embolization versus stent-assisted coiling: Comparison
of complication rates and angiographic outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1177/159101991201800214
J Neurointerv Surg, 11: 812–816. 41. Turjman F, Massoud TF, Ji C, et al., 1994, Combined stent
implantation and endosaccular coil placement for treatment
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014555
of experimental wide-necked aneurysms: A feasibility study
31. Mascitelli JR, Moyle H, Oermann EK, et al., 2015, An update in swine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 15: 1087–1090.
to the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification of intracranial
aneurysms treated with coil embolization. J Neurointerv 42. Modi J, Eesa M, Menon BK, et al., 2011, Balloon-assisted
Surg, 7: 496–502. rapid intermittent sequential coiling (BRISC) technique
for the treatment of complex wide-necked intracranial
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011258 aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol, 17: 64–69.
32. Greve T, Sukopp M, Wostrack M, et al., 2021, Initial https://doi.org/10.1177/159101991101700110
Raymond-Roy Occlusion classification but not packing 43. Secondary. Available from: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/
density defines risk for recurrence after aneurysm coiling. raymondroy-occlusion-classification-of-intracranial-
Clin Neuroradiol, 31: 391–399.
aneurysms-1?lang=us [Last accessed on 2023 Feb 27].
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00926-x
44. Pierot L, Biondi A, Narata AP, et al., 2017, Should indications
33. Stapleton CJ, Torok CM, Rabinov JD, et al., 2016, Validation for WEB aneurysm treatment be enlarged? Report of a series
of the Modified Raymond-Roy classification for intracranial of 20 patients with aneurysms in “atypical” locations for
aneurysms treated with coil embolization. J Neurointerv WEB treatment. J Neuroradiol, 44: 203–209.

Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023) 9 https://doi.org/10.36922/an.293