Page 49 - AN-2-4
P. 49

Advanced Neurology                                                         Genomic insights into Alzheimer

























































            Figure 1. Schematic representation of the workflow employed in this study.
            Abbreviations: AA: Amino acid; APP: Amyloid precursor protein; RMSD: Root mean square deviation.

            Ramachandran plot, Verify3D, ERRAT, and ProSA. The   comparing results to statistically sound structures. A good
            Ramachandran Plot  diagrams were generated using   structure, as determined by Verify3D, exhibited a score
            the PDBsum database (www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/   of approximately 90% or higher [29,30] . On the other hand,
            databases/cgi-bin/pdbsum/) ,  illustrating  structure  ERRAT tools analyze statistics of non-bonded interactions
                                  [28]
            quality by comparing psi and phi values to identify   between different atom types, with a good score defined
                                                                                          [31]
            disallowed and stable/allowed conformations. A structure   as above 80 for protein structure . The ProSA protein
            was considered of good quality if over 90% of residues   structure analysis software (prosa.services.came.sbg.
            resided in the most favored region. These diagrams were   ac.at) was employed to calculate the overall protein model
            collected for all initial and refined protein structures to   quality (z-score) and local model quality (residue scores)
            facilitate a comprehensive comparison of protein structure   for each initial and refined protein model [32,33] . Local
            quality. Verify3D and ERRAT quality analyses were   model quality, assessed on a residue-by-residue basis,
            performed via the SAVES v6.0 server (saves.mbi.ucla.edu/).   deemed each residue as of good quality if window size
            Verify3D determines the compatibility of a 3D model with   40 was below 0.0 . Visual comparison of the number
                                                                              [32]
            its amino acid sequence, assigning a structural class and   of residues below the 0.0 mark determined whether

            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2023)                         4                         https://doi.org/10.36922/an.1734
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54