Page 104 - AN-3-4
P. 104

Advanced Neurology                                              Shuntogram technique in programmable valves



            sufficiently sensitive to confirm patency nor specific   limitations in accurately delineating shunt function after
            enough to justify diagnostic intervention. 28      40 years.
              Vernet et al.  analyzed 56 radionuclide scans, observing   In  2024, Nandoliya  et al.  reported  on 211  nuclide
                                                                                       24
                        18
            a trend in flow with clearance half-time for the reservoir   procedures performed from 2003 to 2022. They injected
            ranging from 1 – 7.5 min. They concluded that a negative   0.5 ml or less of nuclide followed by a small saline flush.
            scan was characterized by contrast distal to the tip within   Patients were encouraged to ambulate, if possible, during
            10 min, extending up to 30 min after injection. However,   the 30-min imaging period. No valve setting adjustments
            even with these new time guidelines, subsequent studies   were made. The study reported a sensitivity of 92.3% and
            reported false-negative rates of 14 – 25% and near-zero false   a specificity of 96.2%, with no mention of programmable
            positives over the following decade, with a recommended   valve adjustments.
            flow detection window of 10 – 15 min. 2,17
                                                                 These studies do not specifically address the current
              Due to the significant variability in findings, Ouellette   widespread use of programmable shunt valves. It is possible
            et al.  conducted a retrospective study on 69  patients   that limited or absent flow may occur simply because the
                7
            presenting to the emergency department who underwent   patient’s intracranial pressure is below the valve setting at
            99m Tc-DTPA shuntograms. Three blinded investigators   any specific moment. Therefore, shunt obstruction cannot
            interpreted the results: patients who did not return within   be accurately diagnosed unless the valve pressure has been
            4  weeks were classified as negative, while those with   sufficiently reduced to allow flow, even if the intracranial
            intraoperative confirmation of shunt issues were classified   pressure is extremely low. In addition, variability in
            as positive. The study reported a sensitivity of 92.6% and   radiocontrast usage persists within the same study, with
            a specificity of 59.5% in patients who had a shuntogram.  99m Tc-DTPA remaining the most commonly administered

              Six years later, Thompson  et  al.  highlighted the   contrast agent in shuntograms.
                                           3
            challenges in determining shunt failure through a large-  Research into biodegradable nanoshells (e.g., hyaluronic
            scale study reviewing 259 shuntograms. The inclusion   acid) encapsulating radiotracers is growing. Ganau et al.
                                                                                                            29
            criteria were discordant symptoms with stable ventricle   highlighted the diagnostic potential of nanoshell technology
            size.  Imaging  was  performed  every  15  min  over  1  h.   in inflammatory and oncologic pathologies, noting its
            A “normal” shuntogram was defined in four different ways   optimization of contrast media for neuroradiology and
            based on contrast movement into the distal site. Despite   nuclear medicine, including applications with   99m Tc-
            “normal” times ranging from 15 to 45 min, they found low   DTPA. Further studies may benefit from this technology,
            sensitivity and high specificity. Ultimately, they determined   potentially establishing a standardized radiotracer for
            that a true negative result occurred when a patient with   shuntograms.
            a normal shuntogram did not return to the emergency
            department within 30 days. This finding underscored the   4. Conclusion
            need for clinical judgment and ongoing observation in
            interpreting shuntogram studies.                   The burden of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus underscores
                                                               the need for reliable methods to accurately detect shunt failure.
              In 2020, Quezada and Gordon  conducted 146       This article presents evidence highlighting the heterogeneous
                                           11
            radiopharmaceutical flow studies in patients presenting   techniques  and  outcomes  associated  with  shuntograms,
            with headache, nausea, vomiting, irritability, and altered   alongside an example of successful implementation
            neurologic function despite normal computed tomography   following our institutional protocol. With proper techniques
            or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were placed in   and protocols, shuntograms have the potential to serve as a
            a  recumbent position and  prepared with  chlorhexidine   valuable tool for diagnosing shunt patency.
            and isopropyl alcohol before a 25-gauge butterfly needle
            was used to inject  99m Tc-DTPA. Fluoroscopy images were   Acknowledgments
            taken every 15  min over 1  h. Rapid flow through the   We thank the Department of Neurosurgery at Oregon
            distal  catheter  into  the  peritoneum  or  vascular  system   Health and Science University for their support.
            was  considered  negative.  They  reported  a  true  negative
            rate of 91% and a true positive rate of 70%. Around the   Funding
            same time, a retrospective study of 95 patients found that
            predicting shunt revision within 30 days had a negative   None.
            predictive  value  of  68.3%.   Both  studies  highlight  that,   Conflict of interest
                                  5
            despite  advancements  in  procedural  techniques  and
            imaging, shuntogram interpretation continues to have   The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

            Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024)                         6                                doi: 10.36922/an.4180
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109